...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based nursing >Is it really bursary or bust? Simon Stevens stirs the pot
【24h】

Is it really bursary or bust? Simon Stevens stirs the pot

机译:它真的是缅因达还是破产? 西蒙史蒂文斯搅动锅

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In England, the bursary for student nurses was removed in 2017 when they also became liable to pay tuition fees.1 The aim was to reduce the cap on student nurse numbers. While the cynics among us may think the real reason was to reduce the £1 billion spent on non-medical pre-registration education each year, the Council of Deans of Health (CoDH) supported the move. They argued that in addition to removing the cap on numbers the change in financing nurse education would leave student nurses better off financially during their pre-registration nursing course.2 The CoDH later acknowledged that the subsequent reduction in applicants was more than expected.3
机译:在英格兰,2017年在2017年删除了学生护士的Bursary,当时他们也倾向于支付学费.1目的是减少学生护士号码上的上限。 虽然我们之间的愤世嫉俗者可能认为真正的原因是每年减少10亿英镑的非医疗前注册教育,但院长的卫生院委员会(CODH)支持这一举动。 他们认为,除了删除数量的上限之外,融资护士教育的变化将在预先登记护理课程期间将学生护士更好地离开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号