...
首页> 外文期刊>Gastric cancer: official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association >Prognostic impacts of the combined positive score and the tumor proportion score for programmed death ligand-1 expression by double immunohistochemical staining in patients with advanced gastric cancer
【24h】

Prognostic impacts of the combined positive score and the tumor proportion score for programmed death ligand-1 expression by double immunohistochemical staining in patients with advanced gastric cancer

机译:患者晚期胃癌患者双免疫组织化学染色,对阳性分数和肿瘤比分表达的预后影响及肿瘤比分。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The tumor proportion score (TPS) and combined positive score (CPS) have been developed to assess programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to elucidate the role of TPS and CPS as prognostic biomarkers. Methods A total of 191 patients with GC who received curative gastrectomy were retrospectively enrolled. Double immunohistochemistry of PD-L1 and ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 was performed to clearly distinguish PD-L1 expression between tumor cells and macrophages. Survival analysis for PD-L1 expression by TPS and CPS was performed. Results PD-L1 positivity was detected in 39 patients (20.4%) by TPS and in 137 patients (71.7%) by CPS. Patients with PD-L1 positivity by CPS experienced significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (P < 0.01) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.01) than the other patients. In contrast, patients with either PD-L1 status by the TPS showed similar OS and RFS times. Multivariate Cox regression analysis for OS and RFS demonstrated that PD-L1 positivity by CPS was a significant independent factor for poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-4.37, P < 0.01) and RFS (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.07-3.22, P = 0.03). Conclusions CPS was shown to be a more useful assessment method of determining PD-L1 expression than TPS as a prognostic biomarker. This suggests that the total number of PD-L1-expressing cells, including tumor and immune cells, is a more sensitive prognostic biomarker than the number of PD-L1-expressing tumor cells in GC.
机译:背景技术已经开发出肿瘤比例评分(TPS)和组合的阳性分数(CPS)以评估胃癌(GC)中的编程死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达。本研究旨在阐明TPS和CPS作为预后生物标志物的作用。方法回顾性地注册了191例接受治疗胃切除术的GC患者。进行PD-L1和电离钙结合衔接子1的双免疫组织化学以清楚地区分肿瘤细胞和巨噬细胞之间的PD-L1表达。进行TPS和CPS的PD-L1表达的存活分析。结果在39名患者(20.4%)和TPS中检测到PD-L1积极性,并通过CPS在137名患者(71.7%)中检测到。 CPS的PD-L1阳性患者显着较短,总存活(OS)(P <0.01)和无复发存活(RFS)(P = 0.01)比其他患者更短。相比之下,TPS的PD-L1状态患者显示出类似的OS和RFS时间。 OS和RFS的多变量COX回归分析表明,CPS的PD-L1阳性是差的差异的重要因素(危险比[HR] 2.27,95%置信区间[CI] 1.27-4.37,P <0.01)和RFS( HR 1.81,95%CI 1.07-3.22,P = 0.03)。结论CPS被证明是一种更有用的评估方法,其测定PD-L1表达而不是TPS作为预后生物标志物。这表明PD-L1表达细胞的总数包括肿瘤和免疫细胞,比GC中的PD-L1表达肿瘤细胞的数量更敏感预后生物标志物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号