首页> 外文期刊>European journal of personality >Beyond 'Liberals' and 'Conservatives': Complexity in Ideology, Moral Intuitions, and Worldview Among Swedish Voters
【24h】

Beyond 'Liberals' and 'Conservatives': Complexity in Ideology, Moral Intuitions, and Worldview Among Swedish Voters

机译:除了“自由主义者”和“保守派”之外:瑞典选民中思想的复杂性,道德直觉和世界观

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This research investigated the congruence between the ideologies of political parties and the ideological preferences (N = 1515), moral intuitions (N = 1048), and political values and worldviews (N = 1345) of diverse samples of Swedish adults who voted or intended to vote for the parties. Logistic regression analyses yielded support for a series of hypotheses about variations in ideology beyond the left-right division. With respect to social ideology, resistance to change and binding moral intuitions predicted stronger preference for a social democratic (vs. progressive) party on the left and weaker preference for a social liberal (vs. social conservative or liberal-conservative) party on the right. With respect to political values and broader worldviews, normativism and low acceptance of immigrants predicted the strongest preference for a nationalist party, while environmentalism predicted the strongest preference for a green party. The effects were generally strong and robust when we controlled for left-right self-placements, economic ideology, and demographic characteristics. These results show that personality variation in the ideological domain is not reducible to the simplistic contrast between 'liberals' and 'conservatives', which ignores differences between progressive and non-progressive leftists, economic and green progressives, social liberal and conservative rightists, and nationalist and non-nationalist conservatives. (c) 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Personality published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Personality Psychology
机译:这项研究调查了政党意识形态的一致性和思想偏好(n = 1515),道德直觉(n = 1048),以及投票或意图的瑞典成年人多样化样本的政治价值观和世界观(n = 1345)投票给各方。 Logistic回归分析产生了一系列关于左右思想中思想变化的一系列假设的支持。关于社会意识形态,抵抗变革和约束性的道德直觉预测对左侧社会民主(与渐进式)党的社会民主(与渐进式)缔约方的偏好更强,对右侧的社会自由主义(与社会保守或自由保守)缔约方的偏好。关于政治价值观和更广泛的世界观,法规主义和越来越低的移民接受预测了对民族党的最强烈偏好,而环保主义预测了对绿党最强烈的偏好。当我们控制左右自我展示,经济意识形态和人口特征时,这种效果通常是强大和强大的。这些结果表明,思想域的个性变化不会降低“自由主义者”和“保守派”之间的简单造影,这忽略了渐进和非逐步左派,经济和绿色进步,社会自由和保守职业党员和民族主义者之间的差异和非民族主义保守派。 (c)2020作者。 John Wiley&Sons Ltd的欧洲人格杂志代表欧洲人格心理学协会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号