首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >Are you better? A multi‐centre study of patient‐defined recovery from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
【24h】

Are you better? A multi‐centre study of patient‐defined recovery from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

机译:你更好吗? 复杂区域疼痛综合征患者定义恢复的多中心研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ( CRPS ) symptoms can significantly differ between patients, fluctuate over time, disappear or persist. This leads to problems in defining recovery and in evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. Objectives To define recovery from the patients’ perspective and better understand their priorities for treatment approaches. Methods Establishing an international consortium, we used a 2‐Round Delphi‐based study in eight countries across Europe and North America. Participants ≥18?years who met, or had met, Budapest clinical criteria were included. Round 1 participants completed the statement: ‘I would/do consider myself recovered from CRPS if/because…’ alongside demographic and health questionnaires. Data were thematically organised and represented as 62 statements, from which participants identified and ranked their recovery priorities in Round 2. Results Round 1 ( N ?=?347, 80% female, 91% non‐recovered) dominant ICF themes were: activities of daily living; bodily functions; external factors; participation and personal factors. The top five priority statements in Round 2 ( N ?=?252) were: no longer having (1) CRPS ‐related pain, (2) generalised pain and discomfort, (3) restricted range of movement, (4) need for medication, (5) stiffness in the affected limb. With very few exceptions, priorities were consistent, irrespective of patient demographics/geography. Symptoms affecting daily activities were among those most frequently reported. Conclusions Our data showed a small number of themes are of highest importance to CRPS patients’ definition of recovery. Patients want their pain, movement restriction and reliance on medication to be addressed, above all other factors. These factors should therefore be foremost concerns for future treatment and rehabilitation programmes. Significance Those with longstanding CRPS may no longer meet diagnostic criteria but still be symptomatic. Defining recovery is therefore problematic in CRPS . Our study has identified patients’ definition of recovery from CRPS , in order of priority, as relief from: their CRPS ‐related pain, generalised pain, movement restriction, reliance on medication, and stiffness.
机译:摘要背景复杂的区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)症状可以在患者之间显着差异,随着时间的推移,消失或持续存在。这导致在定义恢复和评估治疗干预的疗效方面存在问题。目标是从患者的角度来确定恢复,更好地了解其治疗方法的优先事项。方法建立国际财团,我们在欧洲和北美的八个国家使用了一项基于2次的德尔斐研究。参与者≥18?遇到或已达到的历史,包括临床标准。第1轮参与者完成了声明:'我/确实认为自己从CRPS恢复,如果......'沿着人口统计和健康问卷。主题组织并表示为62个陈述,参与者在第2轮中确定并排名其恢复优先事项。结果轮1(n?= 347,80%的女性,91%不恢复的)主导ICF主题是:活动日常生活;身体功能;外在因素;参与和个人因素。第2轮(n?= 252)的前五个优先级陈述是:不再具有(1)CRP-相关的疼痛,(2)广义疼痛和不适,(3)限制范围,(4)需要药物(5)受影响的肢体僵硬。由于患者人口统计/地理学,与少数例外情况下,优先事项是一致的。影响日常活动的症状是最常报告的。结论我们的数据显示少数主题对CRPS患者的恢复定义具有最高的重要性。患者希望他们的疼痛,运动限制和依赖于待解决的药物,高于所有其他因素。因此,这些因素应该对未来的治疗和康复计划最重要的问题。具有长期CRP的意义可能不再符合诊断标准,但仍然是对症的。因此,定义恢复在CRP中存在问题。我们的研究已经确定了患者对CRP的恢复的定义,按优先顺序,从:其CRP相关的疼痛,广义疼痛,运动限制,依赖于药物和僵硬。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European journal of pain :》 |2018年第3期|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Royal United HospitalsBath UK;

    Royal United HospitalsBath UK;

    Royal United HospitalsBath UK;

    University of the West of EnglandBristol UK;

    Royal United HospitalsBath UK;

    Leiden University Medical CentreLeiden The Netherlands;

    VU University Medical CentreAmsterdam The Netherlands;

    Dutch National CRPS Patient OrganizationNijmegen The Netherlands;

    Balgrist University HospitalZurich Switzerland;

    Balgrist University HospitalZurich Switzerland;

    University Medical Centre MainzMainz Germany;

    University Medical Centre MainzMainz Germany;

    Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust and Pain Research InstituteUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpool UK;

    Royal Devon &

    Exeter HospitalExeter UK;

    Royal Devon &

    Exeter HospitalExeter UK;

    Department of NeurologyGeneral Hospital FürthFürth Germany;

    The Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western DenmarkViborg Regional HospitalViborg Denmark;

    Rehabilitation Institute of ChicagoChicago IL USA;

    Pomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecin Poland;

    Markham‐Stouffville HospitalMarkham ON Canada;

    PARC (Promoting Awareness of RSD and CRPS in Canada)St. Catharines Canada;

    CSSS Pierre BoucherLongueuil QC Canada;

    The George Washington University HospitalWashington DC USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 诊断学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号