The yield of long‐term electrocardiographic recordings in refractory focal epilepsy

摘要

Abstract Objective To determine the incidence of clinically relevant arrhythmias in refractory focal epilepsy and to assess the potential of postictal arrhythmias as risk markers for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Methods We recruited people with refractory focal epilepsy without signs of ictal asystole and who had at least one focal seizure per month and implanted a loop recorder with 2‐year follow‐up. The devices automatically record arrhythmias. Subjects and caregivers were instructed to make additional peri‐ictal recordings. Clinically relevant arrhythmias were defined as asystole ≥ 6?seconds; atrial fibrillation 55?beats per minute (bpm), or 200?bpm and duration 30?seconds; persistent sinus bradycardia 40?bpm while awake; and second‐ or third‐degree atrioventricular block and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. We performed 12‐lead electrocardiography (ECG) and tilt table testing to identify non–seizure‐related causes of asystole. Results We included 49 people and accumulated 1060?months of monitoring. A total of 16?474 seizures were reported, of which 4679 were captured on ECG. No clinically relevant arrhythmias were identified. Three people had a total of 18 short‐lasting (6?seconds) periods of asystole, resulting in an incidence of 2.91 events per 1000 patient‐months. None of these coincided with a reported seizure; one was explained by micturition syncope. Other non–clinically relevant arrhythmias included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n?=?2), supraventricular tachycardia (n?=?1), and sinus tachycardia with a right bundle branch block configuration (n?=?1). Significance We found no clinically relevant arrhythmias in people with refractory focal epilepsy during long‐term follow‐up. The absence of postictal arrhythmias does not support the use of loop recorders in people at high SUDEP risk.