...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >Participatory social capacity building: Conceptualisation and experiences from pilots for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands
【24h】

Participatory social capacity building: Conceptualisation and experiences from pilots for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands

机译:参与式社会能力建设:荷兰洪水风险减灾飞行员的概念化和经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social capacity building is increasingly suggested as strategy for supporting vulnerable communities in dealing with natural hazards such as floods. However, research on the empirical implementation of social capacity building is still limited. This paper presents a conceptualisation and an empirical ease study of participatory social capacity building for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands. We designed and implemented two distinct participatory pilots, studied the processes and outcomes to assess what factors influence social capacity building, and assessed how existing capacity may be leveraged. Social capacity is herein conceptualised as consisting of five dimensions: Knowledge, Motivation, Networks, Finance, and Participation. The first pilot included a walk in flood-prone areas and a discussion session with citizens and flood risk authority representatives. The second pilot involved elementary school pupils interviewing senior citizens with flood experience. Based on qualitative observation and analysis of the processes, findings suggest there is good potential for mutual sharing of knowledge if all participating actors are equal in the participatory process, and that informal settings open up debates, but also that leveraging existing social capacities might inadvertently impede the dissemination of knowledge that is vital in coping with (future) disaster risks.
机译:越来越多地建议社会能力建设作为支持脆弱社区的战略,以处理洪水等自然灾害。但是,对社会能力建设的实证实施的研究仍然有限。本文介绍了荷兰洪水风险减灾参与式社会能力建设的实证缓解研究。我们设计和实施了两个不同的参与式飞行员,研究了评估社会能力建设的过程和结果的过程和结果,并评估了如何利用现有能力。社会能力在此概念化为由五个维度组成:知识,动机,网络,金融和参与。第一位飞行员包括散步地区的散步和与公民和洪水风险管理局代表的讨论会。第二个试点涉及小学学生面试具有洪水经验的老年人。根据对流程的定性观察和分析,调查结果表明,如果所有参与的行动者在参与过程中相同,那么非正式的环境开辟了辩论,也有利用现有的社会能力可能无意中阻碍了辩论对应对(未来)灾害风险至关重要的知识传播。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号