首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Adaptive flood risk management planning based on a comprehensive flood risk conceptualisation
【2h】

Adaptive flood risk management planning based on a comprehensive flood risk conceptualisation

机译:基于全面洪水风险概念化的自适应洪水风险管理计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Densely populated deltas are so vulnerable to sea level rise and climate change that they cannot wait for global mitigation to become effective. The Netherlands therefore puts huge efforts in adaptation research and planning for the future, for example through the national research programme Knowledge for Climate and the Delta Programme for the Twenty-first century. Flood risk is one of the key issues addressed in both programmes. Adaptive management planning should rely on a sound ex-ante policy analysis which encompasses a future outlook, establishing whether a policy transition is required, an assessment of alternative flood risk management strategies, and their planning in anticipation without running the risk of regret of doing too little too late or too much too early. This endeavour, addressed as adaptive delta management, calls for new approaches, especially because of uncertainties about long-term future developments. For flood risk management, it also entails reconsideration of the underlying principles and of the application of portfolios of technical measures versus spatial planning and other policy instruments. To this end, we first developed a conceptualisation of flood risk which reconciles the different approaches of flood defence management practice and spatial planning practice in order to bridge the gap between these previously detached fields. Secondly, we looked abroad in order to be better able to reflect critically on a possible Dutch bias which could have resulted from many centuries of experience of successful adaptation to increasing flood risk, but which may no longer be sustainable into the future. In this paper, we explain the multiple conceptualisation of flood risk and argue that explicitly distinguishing exposure determinants as a new concept may help to bridge the gap between engineers and spatial planners, wherefore we show how their different conceptualisations influence the framing of the adaptation challenge. Also, we identify what the Netherlands may learn from neighbouring countries with a different framing of the future flood risk challenge.
机译:人口稠密的三角洲极易受到海平面上升和气候变化的影响,以至于迫不及待全球缓解措施生效。因此,荷兰通过国家研究计划“气候知识”和二十一世纪的三角洲计划,为适应性研究和未来计划做出了巨大努力。洪水风险是两个计划都解决的关键问题之一。适应性管理计划应基于合理的事前政策分析,其中包括对未来的展望,确定是否需要进行政策过渡,评估替代洪水风险管理策略及其预期的计划,而又不会为此感到后悔太少太晚或太早太少。这种努力被称为适应性三角洲管理,它要求采取新的方法,特别是由于对长期未来发展的不确定性。对于洪灾风险管理,还需要重新考虑基本原理以及技术措施与空间规划和其他政策工具的组合应用。为此,我们首先提出了洪水风险的概念,以协调防洪管理实践和空间规划实践的不同方法,以弥合这些先前分离的领域之间的差距。其次,我们将目光投向国外,以便能够更好地批判性地思考荷兰可能存在的偏见,这可能是由于成功适应洪水风险不断增加的数百年经验而产生的,但在未来可能不再可持续。在本文中,我们解释了洪水风险的多重概念化,并认为将暴露决定因素作为一个新概念进行明确区分可能有助于弥合工程师和空间规划者之间的鸿沟,因此我们展示了他们的不同概念如何影响适应挑战的框架。此外,我们确定了荷兰可以从邻国那里学到什么,对未来的洪水风险挑战有不同的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号