首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >The nexus between social inequality and CO2 emissions revisited: Challenging its empirical validity
【24h】

The nexus between social inequality and CO2 emissions revisited: Challenging its empirical validity

机译:社会不平等和二氧化碳排放之间的Nexus评为:挑战其经验有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recently, a discussion about the ambiguity of the nexus between social inequality and anthropogenic CO2 emissions has emerged. Macroeconomic panel studies applying region and time fixed effects (FE) regression models and measuring inequality by the Gini coefficient discovered a flat relationship. Only two of these studies substituting Gini by the more appropriate share held by the top 10 percent of the income or wealth distribution find a positive effect. This paper revisits this nexus and challenges the empirical validity of the contribution of an increase in wealth and income inequality to higher CO2 emissions lately found by Knight et al. (2017) on country-level and by Jorgenson et al. (2017) on U.S. state-level. The positive inequality effects spotted in these two studies are not robust with respect to the regions and time spans observed as well as to the inequality indicators, estimation techniques, and confounders selected. Hence, this in-depth investigation suggests that there is no sound empirical evidence for a substantial nexus between social inequality and CO2 emissions. After all, lately proposed policy approaches combining efficient cap-and trade programs with income and wealth redistribution (so-called cap-and-dividend schemes) are not, by themselves, suitable for an effective climate policy. In fact, the analysis points at the relevance of treating key predictors of CO2 emissions including energy prices for the U.S. for effective climate change mitigation.
机译:最近,出现了关于社会不平等和人为二氧化碳排放的歧视的讨论。宏观经济面板研究应用区域和时间固定效应(FE)回归模型和基尼系数测量不等式发现了一个平坦的关系。这些研究中只有两项替代Gini的额度占有更多的收入或财富分布的份额的份额,发现了积极效应。本文重新审视了这种Nexus,挑战了骑士等人最近发现的财富和收入不平等增加的贡献的经验有效性。 (2017)在国家级和Jorgenson等人。 (2017)在美国级别。发现这两项研究中发现的正不平等效应对观察到的区域和时间跨度以及所选择的不等式指标,估计技术和混杂物的时间不稳健。因此,这种深入的调查表明,在社会不平等和二氧化碳排放之间的大量内部没有声音证据。毕竟,最近拟议的政策方法与收入和财富重新分配(所谓的CAP-ay股票计划)结合有效的CAP-&贸易计划并非由他们自己,适合有效的气候政策。事实上,分析点处理二氧化碳排放的关键预测因子,包括美国的能源价格为有效的气候变化缓解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号