首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Damage Mechanics >Toward automated identification and quantification of meso-scale damage modes in plain weave glass/epoxy composite laminates
【24h】

Toward automated identification and quantification of meso-scale damage modes in plain weave glass/epoxy composite laminates

机译:用于自动识别和定量普通织物玻璃/环氧复合层压板中的中间尺度损伤模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigated three different automated methods for identification and quantification of meso-scale damage on single-layer composite laminates subjected to ballistic impact by a 5.5 mm (0.22 caliber) right circular cylindrical steel projectile. These methods were based on the combined use of high-resolution optical imaging, fluorescence microscopy, and image detection software. High-resolution images of impacted composite samples were processed using either ImageJ alone (method 1, for sample size of 20 x 20 cm(2)) or ImageJ plus MATLAB (method 2, for sample size of 20 x 20 cm(2)), or fluorescence images were processed using ImageJ plus MATLAB (method 3, for sample size of 6 x 5 cm(2)). These methods were used for identification and grouping of horizontal and vertical transverse tow cracks, and 45 degrees matrix cracks. The identified and grouped damage modes were quantified based on spatial pixel count related to damage modes, and quantified damage modes were used to generate a digital damage map using a separate MATLAB code for all three methods. Finally, the advantages and shortcomings of each of these three automated methods for identification and quantification of meso-scale damage modes were evaluated via comparison to a baseline manual method for identifying and quantifying the damage modes on the same samples.
机译:我们调查了三种不同的自动化方法,用于通过5.5mm(0.22口径)右圆柱形钢射弹进行弹道冲击的单层复合层压板上的中间层尺度损伤的识别和定量。这些方法基于高分辨率光学成像,荧光显微镜和图像检测软件的组合使用。仅使用Imagej(方法1,样品尺寸为20×20cm(2))或Imagej加MATLAB(方法2,用于样品尺寸20×20cm(2))的高分辨率图像或者使用imagej加matlab处理或荧光图像(方法3,用于样品尺寸为6×5cm(2))。这些方法用于识别和分组水平和垂直横向丝束裂缝,45度矩阵裂缝。基于与损坏模式相关的空间像素计数来量化识别和分组的损坏模式,并且使用量化的损坏模式使用三种方法使用单独的MATLAB代码生成数字损坏图。最后,通过与基线手动方法进行比较评估这三种自动化方法中的每三种自动化方法中的每三种自动化方法中的每一种的优点和缺点,用于识别和量化同一样本上的损坏模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号