首页> 外文期刊>In Practice >Comments on the dilemma in the March issue: When the client cannot pay
【24h】

Comments on the dilemma in the March issue: When the client cannot pay

机译:对3月问题困境的评论:当客户无法支付时

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the dilemma discussed in the March issue of In Practice, you worked in a clinic owned by a charity that provided subsidised treatment. A 10-year-old bitch presents with a suspected closed pyometra. The owner cannot pay for the treatment, even at the charity's prices. While discussing the case, an EMS student offers to pay if they can keep the dog. What should you do? (IP, March 2017, vol 39, pp 142-143). Peter Fordyce suggested that there were two options if the bitch's owner could not meet the costs of treatment: transferring the legal responsibilty of the bitch to a new owner, or euthanasia. Both of these may not be palatable to the owner. Before discussing the student's offer, it might be better to explore if the charity is in a position to take over ownership of the bitch, fund the treatment and rehome it. If it is not, then the student's offer could be discussed with tact. If there are no options for rehoming and no options for payment of the treatment, euthanasia would be the only way to relieve the dog's suffering.
机译:在3月份在实践中讨论的困境中,您在一家提供了补贴待遇的慈善机构所拥有的诊所。一个10岁的婊子呈现出疑似闭合的pyometra。店主不能支付治疗费用,即使在慈善机构的价格也是如此。虽然讨论了这种情况,但EMS学生会提供如果他们能够保持狗。你该怎么办? (IP,2017年3月,Vol 39,PP 142-143)。 Peter Fordyce建议如果母狗的所有者无法满足治疗费用,则有两种选择:将母狗的法律责任转移到新所有者或安乐死。这两个都可能对所有者口无常。在讨论学生的报价之前,如果慈善机构能够接管婊子的所有权,则可能会更好地探索攻击,为治疗和重新提供它。如果不是,那么学生的报价可以用Tact讨论。如果没有选择的选择,并且没有支付治疗的选择,安乐死将是缓解狗遭受痛苦的唯一方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号