首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Developmental Disabilities >Review of cluster analysis of phenotypic data in Autism Spectrum Disorders: distinct subtypes or a severity gradient model?
【24h】

Review of cluster analysis of phenotypic data in Autism Spectrum Disorders: distinct subtypes or a severity gradient model?

机译:自闭症谱系障碍中表型数据的聚类分析述评:不同的亚型或严重性梯度模型?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) form a heterogeneous group, posing a challenge for clinical definition. Additional problems regarding the diverse clinical presentation arise from changes in diagnostic criteria according to the latest Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), with exclusion of individuals who met earlier criteria or inclusion of more than previously. Objectives: To investigate studies that have attempted to reduce the heterogeneity of ASD based on cluster analysis of phenotypic data and to clarify whether ASD should be interpreted as 'a unitary spectrum,' with a severity gradient, or defined by distinct subtypes. This will allow better understanding of the disorder with implications for its treatment and prognosis. Methods: A literature search was made through PubMed, Researchgate and Google Scholar for studies of ASD populations. In addition, reference lists from identified studies were reviewed. Results: Only 10 studies were found that dealt with the heterogeneity of ASD and its different subtypes, based on the review prerequisites. Most of the studies appear to support the existence of subtypes within ASD, but it remains unclear whether these are considered as different specific subtypes with characteristic profiles of symptoms or as a part of a severity gradient across symptom domains. Conclusions: Drawing definitive conclusions from the published studies about the nature of ASD is difficult, due to the fundamental methodological differences among the studies and their inconsistent findings. This review shed light on a number of discrepancies regarding the current classification of ASD. However, future research will be necessary to provide a more definite answer on the question of a definition based on separate diagnostic subtypes or on a severity gradient by including larger samples that are followed longitudinal and by applying better diagnostic system and choosing the appropriate variables.
机译:背景:具有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个体形成异质组,对临床定义构成挑战。根据精神障碍(DSM-5)的最新诊断和统计手册,诊断标准的变化出现了有关各种临床介绍的额外问题,其中排除了符合前标准或纳入前述的个人。目的:要调查试图根据表型数据的聚类分析试图降低ASD异质性的研究,并阐明ASD是否应被解释为“酉光谱”,具有严重程度梯度,或由不同的亚型定义。这将使对其治疗和预后的影响更好地了解疾病。方法:通过PubMed,Resepardgate和Google Scholar进行文献搜索,以获得ASD人群的研究。此外,综述了所识别研究的参考列表。结果:根据审查先决条件,只发现10项研究涉及ASD及其不同亚型的异质性。大多数研究似乎都支持ASD内的亚型,但它仍然尚不清楚这些是否被认为是不同的特定亚型,其具有症状的特征谱或症状域中的严重程度梯度的一部分。结论:由于研究中的基本方法论差异及其不一致的发现,难以从发表的关于ASD的性质的明确结论。这篇评论阐明了关于ASD当前分类的多种差异。然而,将来必须在基于单独的诊断亚型或严重程度梯度上提供更明确的研究,以便通过包括纵向的较大样本以及应用更好的诊断系统并选择合适的变量来提供更明确的验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号