首页> 外文期刊>Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy >A factual and perceptional framework for assessing diversity effects of online recommender systems
【24h】

A factual and perceptional framework for assessing diversity effects of online recommender systems

机译:用于评估在线推荐系统的多样性效果的事实和感知框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of online recommender systems (RS) on three types of diversity: algorithmic recommendation diversity, perceived recommendation diversity and sales diversity. The analysis distinguishes different recommendation algorithms and shows whether user perceptions match the actual effects of RS on sales. Design/methodology/approach An online experiment was conducted using a realistic shop design, various recommendation algorithms and a representative consumer sample to ensure the generalizability of the findings. Findings Recommendation algorithms show a differential impact on sales diversity, but only collaborative filtering can lead to higher sales diversity. However, some of these effects are subject to how much information firms have about users' preferences. The level of recommendation diversity perceived by users does not always reflect the factual diversity effects. Research limitations/implications - Recommendation and consumption patterns might differ for other types of products; future studies should replicate the study with search or credence goods. The authors also recommend that future research should move from taking a unidimensional measure for the assessment of diversity and employ multidimensional measures instead. Practical implications - Online shops need to conduct a more comprehensive assessment of their RS' effect on diversity, taking into account not only the effects on their sales distribution, but also on users' perceptions and faith in the recommendation algorithm. Originality/value This study offers a framework for assessing different forms of diversity in online RS. It employs various recommendation algorithms and compares their impact using not just one but three different types of diversity measures. This helps explaining some of the contradictious findings from the previous literature.
机译:目的本文的目的是探讨在线推荐系统(RS)对三种多样性的影响:算法推荐多样性,感知推荐多样性和销售多样性。分析区分不同推荐算法并显示用户感知是否与销售额的实际效果匹配。设计/方法/方法使用现实的商店设计,各种推荐算法和代表性消费者样本进行了在线实验,以确保调查结果的普遍性。调查结果推荐算法显示对销售多样性的差异影响,但只有协作过滤可能导致更高的销售分集。但是,其中一些效果受到许多信息公司对用户偏好的影响。用户感知的推荐多样性的水平并不总是反映事实的多样性效应。研究限制/影响 - 其他类型的产品可能有所不同的建议和消费模式;未来的研究应用搜索或信用商品复制研究。作者还建议未来的研究应该从对多样性的评估和采用多维措施来迈出一个单向措施。实际意义 - 在线商店需要对其对多样性的卢比进行更全面的评估,而不仅考虑了对销售分配的影响,而且考虑到了对推荐算法的用户的看法和信仰。本研究的原创性/价值提供了评估在线卢比的不同形式的多样性的框架。它采用各种推荐算法,并使用不仅仅是三种不同类型的多样性措施来比较它们的影响。这有助于解释以前文学中的一些矛盾的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号