首页> 外文期刊>International quarterly of community health education >Health-Related Research Projects in Fiji and Papua New Guinea: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Fiji and Papua New Guinea Health Research Portals
【24h】

Health-Related Research Projects in Fiji and Papua New Guinea: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Fiji and Papua New Guinea Health Research Portals

机译:斐济和巴布亚新几内亚与健康有关的研究项目:斐济和巴布亚新几内亚卫生研究门户的横截面分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Evidence-based medicine and evidence-based public health rely on the best available evidence generated in a specific area for it to be implemented in healthcare practice. This study assesses the range of research studies conducted in Fiji and Papua New Guinea (PNG) islands by reviewing the types of studies now registered with the respective health research registry portals. We assessed all studies registered on the Fiji Health Research Portal (FHRP) and Papua New Guinea Health Research Portal (PNGHRP) since 2014 for the following details: year of registration; study type and participants; field of research; basic statistical analyses; and multicentric or single center study. A total of 99 studies were registered in the FHRP and 6 in PNGHRP during the period under review. Nearly, one fourth of the studies from Fiji and one third from PNG islands are studies evaluating various health policies without involving or collecting data from human subjects. All the registered studies in both the islands were observational (rather than experimental). A total of 58.2% of the registered studies in FHRP and 66.7% in PNGHRP were performed as student projects. A geographic scope of 21.2% of the proposed studies in FHRP and 33.3% in PNGHRP was limited to the respective islands. We conclude from the present analysis that there is a clear need for conducting more high-quality research in both Fiji and PNG in order to meet the health needs of the respective nations. More research focusing on health needs and contributing factors to both communicable and noncommunicable diseases are the need of the hour in both of these south Pacific islands.
机译:基于证据的医学和基于证据的公共卫生依赖于在医疗保健实践中实施的特定区域中产生的最佳证据。本研究评估斐济和巴布亚新几内亚(PNG)群岛在斐济和巴布亚新几内亚(PNG)群岛在各自的卫生研究登记门户网站上注册的类型进行了评估。我们评估了在斐济卫生研究门户(FHRP)和巴布亚新几内亚卫生研究门户(PNGHRP)注册的所有研究,因为以下详细信息:登记年份;学习类型和参与者;研究领域;基本统计分析;和多中心或单一中心研究。在审查期间,共有99项研究在FHRP和PNGHRP中注册了6项。几乎,来自斐济的四分之一和PNG岛屿的三分之一是在不涉及或收集来自人类受试者的数据的情况下评估各种健康政策的研究。岛上的所有注册研究都是观察性(而不是实验性的)。在FHRP中共有58.2%的注册研究和66.7%的PNGHRP作为学生项目进行。在FHRP中拟议研究的21.2%的地理范围和PNGHRP中的33.3%仅限于各自的岛屿。我们从本分析中得出结论,有明确需要在斐济和PNG进行更高质量的研究,以满足各国的健康需求。更多的研究重点关注沟通和非传染性疾病的健康需求和促进因素是这两个南太平洋岛中间的需要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号