首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refrigeration >Environmental impact assessment of R-152a as a drop-in replacement of R-134a in a domestic refrigerator
【24h】

Environmental impact assessment of R-152a as a drop-in replacement of R-134a in a domestic refrigerator

机译:R-152A的环境影响评估作为国内冰箱中R-134A的替代品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the European Union F-gas Regulation limited the use of some refrigerants in several applications. Regarding the domestic refrigeration sector, the F-gas Regulation banned the use of refrigerants with GWP values higher than 150. This fact led the scientific community to search for a replacement of R-134a, that is the most common refrigerant used in domestic refrigerators in USA. In this work, a comprehensive environmental analysis of the drop-in substitution of R-134 with a low GWP refrigerant (R-152a) in a no-frost domestic refrigerator was performed. The comparison, based on experimental data, between the environmental performance of the refrigeration system with the two refrigerants was carried out developing two different evaluation methods, which led to the evaluation of TEWI and LCCP, respectively. Both these metrics consider both direct and indirect contributions to global warming. Historical data of different countries were used to forecast the carbon intensity values for the next 15 years, which were then used to evaluate indirect emissions of the system during its lifetime. Considering the Italian case study, the results showed that the refrigerator working with an optimal charge of R-152a, identified as the mass charge that minimises TEWI and/or LCCP index, has better environmental performance than the system working with R-134a, with a reduction of TEWI and LCCP values of 10.3% and 9.4%, respectively. The same comparison, in terms of LCCP, was also performed for other European countries, showing a strong dependence of the LCCP index on carbon intensity values. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
机译:在欧洲联盟F-GAR调节限制在几种应用中使用一些制冷剂。关于国内制冷部门,F气调节禁止使用GWP值高于150的制冷剂。这一事实领导了科学界的替代品,即国内冰箱中使用的最常见的制冷剂美国。在这项工作中,进行了No-Frost家用冰箱中的低GWP制冷剂(R-152a)的R-134替代的综合环境分析。基于实验数据的比较,在具有两种制冷剂的制冷系统的环境性能之间进行了两种不同的评估方法,其分别产生了TEWI和LCCP的评价。这两项指标都考虑到全球变暖的直接和间接贡献。使用不同国家的历史数据来预测未来15年的碳强度值,然后用于评估其寿命期间系统的间接排放。考虑到意大利案例研究,结果表明,冰箱与R-152a的最佳充电一起工作,被确定为最小化TEWI和/或LCCP指数的质量充电,具有比使用R-134a的系统更好的环境性能,减少TEWI和LCCP值分别为10.3%和9.4%。在LCCP方面,也对其他欧洲国家进行了相同的比较,表明LCCP指数对碳强度值的强烈依赖性。 (c)2020 Elsevier Ltd和IIR。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号