首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refrigeration >Exergoeconomic performance comparison of R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a domestic refrigerator
【24h】

Exergoeconomic performance comparison of R1234yf as a drop-in replacement for R134a in a domestic refrigerator

机译:R1234YF作为国内冰箱中R134A替代品R1234YF的exergo经济性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The replacement of refrigerants in domestic refrigerators is nowadays one of the approaches used to enhance the performance and environmental impact of these systems. Theoretical and experimental research, mainly focused on energy or exergy analysis, is currently found in the literature, but only a few studies are focused on exergoeconomic approaches. Therefore, in order to include the overall costs of a domestic refrigerator, an exergoeconomic cost analysis is applied to an experimental installation. Exergoeconomic parameters such as the unit exergy cost (c(p)) and the exergoeconomic factor (f) are used as a comparative indicator of performance. Based on the unit exergy cost, the results show that R134a performs better than R1234yf at different operating conditions. The exergoeconomic factor presents higher values for R134a than for R1234yf, which implies less exergy destruction in the system. The optimization allows reducing the cost of the produced cold by 9.8% when using R134a and by 6.5% when using R1234yf. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
机译:如今,在国内冰箱中更换制冷剂是用于增强这些系统对性能和环境影响的方法之一。理论和实验研究主要集中在能源或漏洞分析上,目前在文献中发现,但只有几项研究都集中在Exergo经济方法上。因此,为了包括国内冰箱的整体成本,对实验装置进行了exergo经济成本分析。诸如单位漏洞成本(C(P))和Exergo经济因素(F)的Exergo经济参数用作性能的比较指标。基于该单位漏洞成本,结果表明,R134A在不同的操作条件下比R1234YF更好地执行。 exergo经济因素呈现R134A的较高值,而不是R1234YF,这意味着系统中较少的毁灭。优化允许在使用R1234YF时使用R134A和6.5%将产生的冷的成本降低9.8%。 (c)2019年Elsevier Ltd和IIR。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号