首页> 外文期刊>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology >Feasibility of 1000Hz tympanometry in infants: Tympanometric trace classification and choice of probe tone in relation to age
【24h】

Feasibility of 1000Hz tympanometry in infants: Tympanometric trace classification and choice of probe tone in relation to age

机译:婴儿1000Hz鼓膜的可行性:变压计量跟踪分类与年龄探测音调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has significantly reduced the age of children undergoing audiological examinations. Middle ear function is usually evaluated with tympanometry using a probe tone of 226. Hz, although higher frequencies are recommended in infants. The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility of 226 and 1000. Hz tympanometry for different trace classification systems in relation to age, risk factors for hearing loss and ear canal volume. Methods: Data from 577 infants (915 ears) <1 year were analyzed. Tympanograms were classified according to the classification systems of Jerger [16], Marchant et al. [4] and Kei et al. [5] and correlated with ear microscopy as the gold standard. Test quality parameters of tympanometry with probe tones of 226 and 1000. Hz were compared in four different age groups. Results: The trace classification following Kei et al. presented the best correlation to ear microscopy and reduced the number of unclassified tympanograms. The use of probe tones of 226. Hz in infants below the age of nine months showed a poor level of sensitivity. Conclusions: We recommend the use of a 1000. Hz probe tone in infants at least up to the age of nine months. In this age group, 226. Hz tympanometry is inappropriate. In children with craniofacial abnormalities and smaller ear canal volumes, 1000. Hz tympanometry could be taken into consideration, even for older children. High-frequency tympanograms should be evaluated according to the classification system of Kei et al., which differentiates between peaked (normal) and flat (abnormal) curves.
机译:目的:普遍的新生儿听证筛查(UNHS)显着降低了接受听力学考试的儿童年龄。中耳功能通常使用226分的鼓风测量法评估。婴儿建议使用较高频率的探针。本研究的目的是将226和1000的可行性进行比较不同跟踪分类系统,与年龄相关的不同迹线分类系统,危险因素用于听力损失和耳道数量的危险因素。方法:分析了577名婴儿(915只耳朵)<1年的数据。根据杰尔格的分类系统进行分类,Marchant等人。 [4]和Kei等人。 [5]并与耳朵显微镜相关作为金标准。用226和1000的探针音测定的鼓膜测量的测试质量参数。在四个不同年龄组中比较Hz。结果:KEI等人之后的跟踪分类。呈现与耳镜显微镜的最佳相关性,并减少了未分类的鼓膜图的数量。在九个月的年龄低于婴儿226分的探针音调的使用表现出较差的敏感性差。结论:建议在婴儿中使用至少九个月的婴儿1000分钟。在这个年龄组中,226. Hz鼓室计量不合适。在患有颅面异常和较小的耳道卷的儿童中,即使对于年龄较大的儿童,也可以考虑1000。Hz鼓室测量仪。应根据Kei等人的分类系统进行评估高频鼓胀。,它在峰值(正常)和扁平(异常)曲线之间区分开来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号