首页> 外文期刊>International journal of legal medicine >Death by anaphylactic shock in an institution: an accident or negligence?
【24h】

Death by anaphylactic shock in an institution: an accident or negligence?

机译:在机构的过敏性休克死亡:事故或疏忽?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This is a description of a man, institutionalised for learning difficulties, known to have an allergy to seafood. After eating a pie, the patient quickly developed dyspnoea and vomiting. The staff at the institution administered epinephrine and called the emergency services. Despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the patient died shortly after being admitted to the emergency department of the University Hospitals of Geneva. In the light of the circumstances of the death and of a discrepancy between the information given to the police by the staff at the institution looking after the patient on the one hand, and the preliminary elements of the investigation on the other hand, it was suspected that there was failure in care of the patient and our institute was asked to carry out an autopsy. Basing on all the investigations carried out, the cause of death was anaphylactic reaction following the ingestion of seafood, contrary to what had been alleged by the staff at the home.
机译:这是一个男人的描述,用于学习困难的制度化,已知对海鲜有过敏。 吃完馅饼后,患者迅速发展呼吸困难和呕吐。 该机构的工作人员管理肾上腺素并称为紧急服务。 尽管有心肺复苏,但患者在入住日内瓦大学医院的急诊部门之后不久就死亡。 鉴于死亡的情况和由员工在机构的工作人员一方面照顾患者的员工的信息之间的差异,另一方面调查的初步元素,它被怀疑 照顾病人的失败,我们的研究所被要求进行尸检。 基于所有研究的研究,死亡原因在摄入海鲜后,反应后,与家中的工作人员所指控的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号