首页> 外文期刊>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics >Is abortion justified to save the life or health of a woman? Evidence of public opinion from Accra, Ghana
【24h】

Is abortion justified to save the life or health of a woman? Evidence of public opinion from Accra, Ghana

机译:堕胎是合理的,以拯救一个女人的生命或健康吗? 加纳阿克拉的舆论证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Objective In this study, we sought to determine to what extent the abortion law in Ghana is reflective of public opinion. Methods In a cross‐sectional, community‐based survey, individuals in two fishing communities in Accra were interviewed about their beliefs on abortion between May and July 2016, and sociodemographic, attitudinal, and experience data were collected. Factors associated with the outcome variable (abortion is justified to save the life/health of the woman: Yes/No) were entered into a multivariate logistic regression. Results A total of 508 participants completed the survey. Thirty‐nine percent (n=198) of the sample agreed that abortion was justified to save the life/health of the woman, with no significant differences in this finding when controlling for understanding of the law, gender, marital status, or personal experience of abortion in multivariate analysis. Higher education (odds ratio [ OR ] 1.64 [ P 0.001]) and older age ( OR 1.28 [ P 0.001]) are positively associated with abortion being justified to save life/health, while those?who have had an experience of unwanted sex are less likely to believe that ( OR 0.60 [ P =0.029]). Conclusion The participants held conservative views about the justification of abortion to save a woman's life and/or health. Improving access to safe abortion services will require acknowledgment of the broader social and cultural context that may make accessing such services difficult.
机译:摘要目的在这项研究中,我们试图确定加纳的堕胎法的程度是舆论的反映。方法在基于社区的社区调查中,在2016年5月至7月至7月之间的堕胎中,采访了两种渔业社区的个人,以及收集社会造影,态度和经验数据。与结果变量相关的因素(堕胎是合理的,以挽救女人的生命/健康:是/否)进入多元逻辑回归。结果共有508名参与者完成了调查。三十九(N = 198)的样品同意,堕胎是合理的,以挽救女人的生命/健康,在控制法律,性别,婚姻状况或个人经验时,这一发现没有显着差异多元分析中的流产。高等教育(差距[或] 1.64 [P <0.001])和较大的年龄(或1.28 [P <0.001])与堕胎是合理的,以挽救生命/健康,而那些有经验不需要的性别不太可能相信(或0.60 [p = 0.029])。结论,参与者对堕胎的理由持有保守意见,以挽救女人的生命和/或健康。改善对安全堕胎服务的访问将需要确认可能使此类服务变得困难的更广泛的社会和文化环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号