...
首页> 外文期刊>Information Sciences: An International Journal >Interval multiplicative pairwise comparison matrix: Consistency, indeterminacy and normality
【24h】

Interval multiplicative pairwise comparison matrix: Consistency, indeterminacy and normality

机译:间隔乘法成对比较矩阵:一致性,不确定性和正常性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To manifest human judgments, a long-established method called Pairwise Comparison (PC) has been successfully applied in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In practice, human judgments are often made with uncertainty, and can be characterized by an Interval Multiplicative Pairwise Comparison Matrix (IMPCM). Since consistency is a key issue that has plagued decision makers and researchers for a long time, it is useful to propose a transformation that can effectively convert an inconsistent IMPCM into a consistent one, especially in group decision-making. However, a consistent IMPCM is not sufficient to be acceptable, indeterminacy should also be considered. Moreover, the interval priority weights should be normalized. To consider consistency, indeterminacy, and normality simultaneously, we put forward a new definition of acceptable IMPCM. To obtain such an acceptable IMPCM, we propose a theorem of consistency, a consistent transformation, and a normalized prioritization scheme. As a result, the proposed methods guarantee an inconsistent IMPCM can be directly converted into an acceptable IMPCM. Five theorems are proved to corroborate the proposed methods. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the validity and superiority of the proposed methods. Finally, discussion and conclusions are given. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:为了表明人类判断,已成功应用于分析层次结构(AHP)成功地应用了一种称为成对比较(PC)的长既定方法。在实践中,人类判断通常具有不确定性,并且可以通过间隔乘法成对比较矩阵(IMPCM)来表征。由于一致性是一项关键问题,这已经困扰了决策者和研究人员长期以来,提出可以有效地将不一致的IMPCM转化为一致的转换,特别是在集团决策中的转变是有用的。然而,一致的IMPCM也不足以可接受,也应考虑不确定。此外,应归一化间隔优先级权重。同时考虑一致性,不确定性和正常性,我们提出了可接受的IMPCM的新定义。为了获得这种可接受的IMPCM,我们提出了一致性的定理,一致的变换和归一化优先级方案。结果,所提出的方法可以保证不一致的IMPCM可以直接转换为可接受的IMPCM。证明了五个定理证实了建议的方法。提出了一个数值示例以说明所提出的方法的有效性和优越性。最后,给出了讨论和结论。 (c)2019由elsevier公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号