首页> 外文期刊>Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Journal >PASS theory of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review
【24h】

PASS theory of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review

机译:通过智力和学术成就理论:Meta-Inalytic评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although Planning, Attention, Simultaneous and Successive (PASS) processing theory of intelligence has been argued to offer an alternative look at intelligence and PASS processes - operationalized with the Cognitive Assessment System - have been used in several studies, it remains unclear how well the PASS processes relate to academic achievement. Thus, this study aimed to determine their association by conducting a meta-analysis. A random-effects model analysis of data from 62 studies with 93 independent samples revealed a moderate-tostrong relation between PASS processes and reading, r = 0.409, 95% CI = [0.363, 0.454]), and mathematics, r = 0.461, CI = [0.405, 0.517]. Moderator analyses further showed that (1) PASS processes were more strongly related with reading and math in English than in other languages, (2) Simultaneous processing was more strongly related to math accuracy and problem solving than math fluency, (3) Simultaneous processing was more strongly related to problem solving than Attention, and (4) Planning was more strongly related to math fluency than Simultaneous processing. Age, grade level, and sample characteristics did not influence the size of the correlations. Taken together, these findings suggest that PASS cognitive processes are significant correlates of academic achievement, but their relation may be affected by the language in which the study is conducted and the type of mathematics outcome. They further support the use of intervention programs that stem from PASS theory for the enhancement of reading and mathematics skills.
机译:虽然计划的智力的规划,关注,同时和连续(通过)处理理论措辞才能提供智能和通过过程 - 通过认知评估系统运作 - 已被用于几项研究,但仍然清除通行证程度过程涉及学术成就。因此,本研究旨在通过进行META分析来确定它们的关联。来自93个独立样品的62项研究数据的随机效应模型分析显示通过过程和读数之间的中等戏曲关系,R = 0.409,95%CI = [0.363,0.454])和数学,R = 0.461,CI = [0.405,0.517]。进一步表明,(1)通过过程与英语的读数和数学更强烈地相关,而不是其他语言,同时处理与数学准确性和解决问题比数学流畅性更强烈,(3)同时处理是与问题的问题更强烈相关,而(4)规划与数学流畅性更强烈地相关,而不是同时处理。年龄,年级,样本特征没有影响相关性的大小。这些研究结果表明,通过认知过程是学术成就的显着相关性,但它们的关系可能受到研究的语言的影响以及数学结果的类型。他们进一步支持使用源于通过理论的干预计划来提高阅读和数学技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号