首页> 外文期刊>Information Polity: The International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age >The politics of sharing: Sociotechnical imaginaries of digital platforms
【24h】

The politics of sharing: Sociotechnical imaginaries of digital platforms

机译:分享政治:数字平台的社会技术富有思想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper looks at the role of sociotechnical imaginaries surrounding the governance of the sharing economy in two different locations: Canada and United States. Policy makers are trying to tackle the sharing economy without potentially creating negative impact on innovation. While much of the recent discourse around the sharing economy portrays it negatively, early peer-to-peer digital platforms were envisioned as new pathways toward grassroots, inclusive, fair and low-impact economies (Schor, 2016). However Jasanoff & Kim argue that the evaluation of the positive and negative aspects of technological change have always been influenced by specific tacit or explicit political imaginations of nations in terms of how to power modern social life (Jasanoff & Kim, 2013, p. 190). Using a comparative approach, this paper analyzes these imaginations as they are expressed through policy reports and recommendations. The study shows that the sharing economy appears to be seeking a set of diverse imaginaries including new economic freedom, sustainable consumption, decentralized society, demise of social hierarchies and regulatory freedom.
机译:本文介绍了社会科技富翁在两个不同地点的分享经济治理周围的思想:加拿大和美国。政策制定者正在努力解决分享经济而不会对创新产生负面影响。虽然分享经济周围的最近的大部分话语都被消极地描绘,但早期的点对点数字平台被设想为对基层,包容性,公平和低影响经济体的新途径(Schor,2016)。然而,Jasanoff&Kim认为,评估技术变革的积极和消极方面一直受到国家的特定默契或明确政治想象的影响,而在如何发电现代社会生活(Jasanoff&Kim,2013,第190页) 。使用比较方法,本文分析了这些想象力,因为它们是通过政策报告和建议表示的。该研究表明,共享经济似乎正在寻求一系列多种思想,包括新的经济自由,可持续消费,分散社会,社会等级和监管自由的消亡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号