...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian medical journal >Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP as Compared to Ultrasound/CT in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice
【24h】

Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP as Compared to Ultrasound/CT in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice

机译:与梗阻性黄疸患者的超声/ CT相比MRCP的诊断准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The expanding spectrum of therapeutic options for patients with surgical jaundice makes it necessary for the radiologist to precisely assess the etiology, location, level and extent of disease.Aim: To compare the diagnostic accuracy ofMagnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with Ultrasound and Computed Tomography (CT) in evaluation of patients with obstructive jaundice taking direct cholangiographies (ERCP and PTC), hystologic tests and anatomo-pathological findings after surgical intervention as gold standard.Settings and Design: This prospective study included 50 patients who were referred to the radiology department (DMCH, Laheriasarai) with clinical features of biliary obstructive disease.Materials and Methods: Initial ultrasonography (USC) evaluation was followed by Computed tomography (CT) and Magneti Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP); however in cases of benign pathologies where USG findings were unequivocal Computed tomography (CT )was not done to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure. The results were read by radiologists blinded to other imaging findings. The characteristic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) features/ histopathological diagnosis / surgical findings (as applicable) were considered as final.Results: Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP (98%) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant diseases was relatively high (98% and 98%) as compared to CT (82.86% and 91.43% in benign and malignant respectively) and USG (88% and 88%). In the diagnosis of benign diseases MRCP was 100% sensitive compared to ultrasound (80.77%), which was more sensitive than CT scan (54.55%).In the diagnosis of malignant diseases, MRCP was more sensitive (95.83%) as compared to CT scan (91.67%), which was more sensitive than ultrasonography (79.17%).Conclusion: Ultrasound as a screening modality is useful to confirm or exclude biliary i dilatation and to choose patients for MRCP examination. MRCP is an important non invasive imaging investigation in the pre operative evaluation of patients with obstructive jaundice.
机译:背景:外科黄疸患者的治疗选择的扩展频谱使放射科医师精确评估病因,位置,水平和程度的疾病。优先:比较用超声波和计算的胆管胆管胆管痴呆(MRCP)的诊断精度分层摄影(CT)在评估患有胆阳性(ERCP和PTC)的阻塞性黄疸患者(ERCP和PTC),手术干预后的催眠试验和解剖病理学发现,作为黄金标准。提示和设计:这项前瞻性研究包括50名患者被引用的放射学部门(DMCH,Laheriasarai)具有胆道阻塞性疾病的临床特征。材料和方法:初始超声(USC)评估之后进行了计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁性共振胆管痴呆(MRCP);然而,在良性病理学的情况下,USG发现是明确的计算断层扫描(CT),以避免不必要的辐射暴露。通过向其他成像结果蒙蔽的放射科医生读取结果。特征内窥镜逆行胆管术(ERCP)特征/组织病理学诊断/外科调查(如适用)被认为是最终的。结果:MRCP的诊断准确性(98%)在良性和恶性疾病的诊断中相对较高(98%和98 %)与CT(分别为82.86%和91.43%)和良性和恶性的82.86%)和USG(88%和88%)。在良性疾病的诊断中,与超声(80.77%)相比,MRCP的敏感性比CT扫描更敏感(54.55%)。在恶性疾病的诊断中,与CT相比,MRCP更敏感(95.83%)扫描(91.67%)比超声检查更敏感(79.17%)。结论:作为筛选模态的超声是有用的,可确认或排除胆道我扩张,并选择患者进行MRCP检查。 MRCP是对梗阻性黄疸患者的前术语评估中的重要非侵入性影像学研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号