首页> 外文期刊>Augmentative and alternative communication: AAC >The effects of literacy interventions on single-word reading for individuals who use aided AAC: a systematic review
【24h】

The effects of literacy interventions on single-word reading for individuals who use aided AAC: a systematic review

机译:识字干预对使用辅助AAC的个人单词阅读的影响:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effects of instruction on single-word reading of individuals who use aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). A systematic search identified nine single-case experimental design studies that involved 24 individuals who used aided AAC. Overall, the evidence indicated that instruction had positive effects on reading at the single-word level for individuals across ages and diagnostic categories (i.e., autism spectrum disorder (ASD), cerebral palsy (CP), Down syndrome, and intellectual disability). The studies revealed that these effects were consistent across a range of participant, intervention, and outcome measure characteristics. Phonological approaches, sight-word approaches, and a combination of these two approaches yielded very large effects. Despite the large effects, the findings must be viewed with caution due to limitations in the number of studies and participants and limitations in the reporting of detailed participant and intervention characteristics across the studies. In order to determine which interventions are most effective for which individuals, future research directions are discussed, including the need for greater specificity in describing participant and intervention characteristics, investigations into how to best measure intervention outcomes without requiring spoken responses, and investigations into longer-term interventions targeting a wider range of reading skills.
机译:该系统审查的目的是调查教学对使用辅助增强和替代通信(AAC)的单词读取的单词阅读的影响。系统搜索确定了九种单案实验设计研究,涉及使用辅助AAC的24个个人。总体而言,证据表明,教学对年龄和诊断类别的单词级别的读数读取了积极影响(即,自闭症谱系障碍(ASD),脑瘫(CP),唐氏综合征和智力残疾)。研究表明,这些效应在一系列参与者,干预和结果测量特征上一致。语音方法,观察方法以及这两种方法的组合产生了非常大的效果。尽管有很大的效果,但由于研究和参与者人数的局限性和报告对本研究的详细参与者和干预特征的限制,必须谨慎观察。为了确定哪些干预措施最有效地讨论了哪些人,未来的研究方向被讨论,包括需要更大的特异性在描述参与者和干预特征时,在不需要口头反应的情况下调查如何最佳衡量干预结果,以及调查统治着更广泛的阅读技能的术语干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号