...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology >LLETZ make it simple: Anxiety, pain and treatment outcomes with outpatient large loop excision of the transformation zone under local anaesthesia
【24h】

LLETZ make it simple: Anxiety, pain and treatment outcomes with outpatient large loop excision of the transformation zone under local anaesthesia

机译:Lletz使其简单:焦虑,疼痛和治疗结果与局部麻醉下的转化区的门诊大循环切除

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) is the preferred treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia due to its effectiveness and ability to be performed in an outpatient setting under local anaesthesia (LA). Although current guidelines recommend that most LLETZ can be performed under LA, there is paucity in clinical data of patients' perspectives of outpatient LLETZ. Aim Determining patient acceptability of outpatient LLETZ through assessment of anxiety and pain scores, and comparing treatment outcomes with current standards in terms of margins status, negative histology, short‐term morbidity rates and follow‐up attendance. Materials and Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital over two years (2014–2016). Patients undergoing outpatient LLETZ completed a three‐part questionnaire (before, immediately after and 4–6?weeks post‐procedure). Results One hundred and five patients underwent outpatient LLETZ. Mean pain score was 2 (range 0–8). Pre‐procedure anxiety was common but most resolved post‐procedure. Women who did not have a prior LLETZ discussion were more likely to report moderate‐severe anxiety levels pre‐procedure, compared with women who did (odds ratio 3.00, 95% CI 1.11–8.09, P ?=?0.030). There were no differences found in pain scores when comparing pre‐procedure anxiety levels, prior discussion of LLETZ or mode of anaesthesia. Specimen margins were involved in 42.9%. No association was found between positive cervical margin status and age, pre‐procedure anxiety or post‐procedure pain scores. Most patients were satisfied and attended follow‐up appointments. Conclusion Large loop excision of the transformation zone under LA is a well‐tolerated procedure with high satisfaction and follow‐up rates. Clinicians need to initiate early discussions regarding treatment to minimise procedure‐related anxiety.
机译:背景技术变换区(Lletz)的大环切除由于其有效性和能力在局部麻醉(La)下的门诊环境中进行的有效性和能力,是宫颈上皮内瘤形成的优选治疗。虽然目前的指导方针建议大多数Lletz可以在La下进行,但在门诊Lletz的患者视角下存在缺乏缺乏症。目的通过评估焦虑和疼痛评分,并在利润地位,阴性组织学,短期发病率和后续出勤方面将治疗结果与当前标准进行比较。本研究在大专以上两年(2014-2016)的高级医院进行了材料和方法。接受门诊Lletz的患者完成了三部分问卷(之前,后,后4-6岁以下)。结果一百五名患者接受了门诊Lletz。平均疼痛评分为2(范围0-8)。术前焦虑是常见的,但最重要的过程。没有先前的Lletz讨论的妇女更有可能报告预先进行中度严重的焦虑水平,与那些(赔率比3.00,95%CI 1.11-8.09,P?= 0.030)相比(赔率比3.00,95%CI 1.11-8.09)相比。在比较术前焦虑水平,Lletz或麻醉模式的先前讨论时,疼痛评分没有差异。标本利润率参与了42.9%。在阳性宫颈保证金状态和年龄之间没有发现任何关联,术前焦虑或术后疼痛分数。大多数患者都满足并出席后续预约。结论LA下变换区的大环切除是具有高满意度和后续速率的良好普遍的程序。临床医生需要启动关于治疗的早期讨论,以最大限度地减少与程序相关的焦虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号