...
首页> 外文期刊>Australasian journal on ageing >Development of the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential, a new instrument for measuring Australian medical student attitudes towards older people
【24h】

Development of the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential, a new instrument for measuring Australian medical student attitudes towards older people

机译:澳大利亚老龄化语义差异的发展,一种衡量澳大利亚医学学生对老年人态度的新仪器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective This study outlines development of an instrument for measuring attitudes of medical students towards older people, the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential ( AASD ). Methods Words for AASD scales were derived from the reflections of 151 third year medical students attending two Australian medical schools. A pilot study of the AASD was then undertaken with third year students at another medical school to confirm usability and reliability of the instrument. After slight modification, a larger study using the AASD was then undertaken of medical students attending the three institutions, in order to obtain sufficient data for exploratory factor analysis. Results n?=?321 (response rate 73%). Mean AASD score 73.2/114. Cronbach's α?=?0.86. There was no evidence of sequence bias. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) demonstrated four factors: Instrumentality; Personal Appeal; Experience; and Sociability. A lower mean instrumentality subscore for all students and a higher mean experience subscore for female students were noted. Conclusions The AASD instrument proved internally reliable, and its use was generalisable to different groups of medical students. Its design ensured construct and face validity, and responses were not affected by sequencing bias. This study has revealed positive student attitudes towards older people. Variation in attitudes requires further investigation.
机译:目的本研究概述了一种为澳大利亚老龄化语义差异(AASD)衡量对老年人的医学生态度的仪器。方法从参加两个澳大利亚医学院的151名第三年医学生的反映来源于艾达德级的词汇。然后,在另一位医学院的三年学生进行了对AASD的试验研究,以确认仪器的可用性和可靠性。经过微小的修改后,使用AASD进行更大的研究,然后对参加三个机构的医学生进行,以获得足够的数据进行探索性因子分析。结果n?=?321(响应率73%)。平均AASD评分73.2 / 114。 Cronbach的α?=?0.86。没有证据偏见的证据。探索性因子分析(EFA)展示了四种因素:仪器;个人上诉;经验;和社交性。注意到所有学生的较低平均工具,并注意到女学生的更高平均经验。结论AASD仪器证明内部可靠,其使用是对不同的医学生体群体。其设计确保了构建和面部有效性,并且响应不受排序偏差的影响。本研究揭示了对老年人的积极学生态度。态度的变异需要进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号