首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Randomised placebo-controlled trial of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour--clinical trial with analyses of efficacy and acceptability. The IMOP study.
【24h】

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour--clinical trial with analyses of efficacy and acceptability. The IMOP study.

机译:引产前门诊(在家中)单硝酸异山梨酯(IMN)宫颈成熟的安慰剂对照试验-临床试验,分析疗效和可接受性。 IMOP研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether isosorbide mononitrate (IMN), self-administered vaginally by women at home, improves the process of induction of labour. DESIGN: Randomised double blind placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Large UK maternity hospital. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation > or = 37 weeks gestation, requiring cervical ripening prior to induction of labour. METHODS: IMN (n = 177) or placebo (n = 173) self-administered vaginally at home at 48, 32 and 16 hours prior to the scheduled time of admission for induction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Admission to delivery interval and women's experience of induction of labour. RESULTS: IMN did not shorten the admission to delivery interval as compared with placebo [mean difference of -1.6 hours (95% CI -5.1,1.9, P = 0.37)], despite being more effective than placebo in inducing a change in Bishop score [mean difference of 0.65 (95% CI 0.14,1.17, P = 0.013)]. While both groups found the overall experience of home treatment to be positive, (mean score of 3.8/10 +/- 2.3/10 for the IMN group, where 1 = extremely good and 10 = not at all good) women in the placebo group found it marginally more positive than those in the IMN group (just over half a unit on a 10-point scale, P = 0.043). There were no differences between the groups in the pain or anxiety experienced or willingness to take the treatment in a subsequent pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: IMN self-administered vaginally at home does not shorten admission to delivery interval despite a significant effect on cervical ripeness assessed using the Bishop score. However, women report positive views on cervical ripening at home, and the setting deserves further investigation.
机译:目的:确定在家中妇女自行阴道施用异山梨醇单硝酸盐(IMN)是否能改善引产的过程。设计:随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。地点:英国大型妇产医院。人口或样本:单胎妊娠,头颅表现>或= 37孕周的无脂肪妇女,在引产前需要宫颈成熟。方法:IMN(n = 177)或安慰剂(n = 173)在预定的诱导时间之前48、32和16小时在家自行阴道给药。主要观察指标:准予分娩间隔和妇女引产的经验。结果:与安慰剂相比,IMN并没有缩短入院间隔时间[平均差异为-1.6小时(95%CI -5.1,1.9,P = 0.37)],尽管在诱导Bishop评分方面比安慰剂更有效[平均差异为0.65(95%CI 0.14,1.17,P = 0.013)]。虽然两组都发现家庭治疗的总体经验是积极的,但安慰剂组中的女性(IMN组的平均评分为3.8 / 10 +/- 2.3 / 10,其中1 =非常好而10 =完全不好)发现它比IMN组中的结果略高(在10分制上略超过一个单位的一半,P = 0.043)。两组之间在经历的疼痛或焦虑或在随后的妊娠中是否愿意接受治疗方面没有差异。结论:尽管使用Bishop评分对宫颈成熟度有显着影响,但在家阴道自我给药的IMN不会缩短入院间隔时间。但是,妇女报告在家中对宫颈成熟的正面看法,这一情况值得进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号