...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis care & research >Development and Validation of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reference Criterion for Defining a Positive Sacroiliac Joint Magnetic Resonance Imaging Finding in Spondyloarthritis
【24h】

Development and Validation of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reference Criterion for Defining a Positive Sacroiliac Joint Magnetic Resonance Imaging Finding in Spondyloarthritis

机译:用于在脊椎炎中定义正骶髂关节磁共振成像发现的磁共振成像参考标准的开发和验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective To validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reference criterion for a positive sacroiliac (SI) joint MRI finding based on the level of confidence in the classification of spondyloarthritis (SpA) by expert MRI readers. Methods Four readers assessed SI joint MRIs in 2 inception cohorts (cohorts A and B) of 157 consecutive patients with back pain ages 50 years and 20 age-matched healthy controls. Patients were classified according to clinical examination and pelvic radiography as having nonradiographic axial SpA (n = 51), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 34), or nonspecific back pain (n = 72). Readers indicated their level of confidence in their classification of SpA on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = definitely not SpA and 10 = definite SpA. The MRI reference criterion was prespecified by consensus as the majority of readers indicating a confidence score of 8-10; the absence of SpA required all readers to indicate non-SpA (a confidence score of 0-4). We calculated interreader reliability and agreement between MRI-based and clinical classification using kappa statistics. We estimated cutoff values for MRI lesions attaining a specificity of 0.90 for SpA. Results In cohorts A and B, 76.4% and 71.6% of subjects met the MRI criterion, respectively. The kappa values for interreader agreement were 0.76 for cohort A and 0.80 for cohort B and between MRI-based and clinical assessment were 0.93 for cohort A and 0.57 for cohort B. Using this MRI reference criterion, the cutoff for the number of affected SI joint quadrants needed to reach a predefined specificity of 0.90 was 2 for bone marrow edema (BME) in both cohorts and 1 for erosion in both cohorts, and the BME and/or erosion lesions increased sensitivity without reducing specificity. Conclusion This data-driven study using 2 inception cohorts and comparing clinical and MRI-based classification supports the case for including both erosion and BME to define a positive SI joint MRI finding for the classification of axial SpA.
机译:目的验证磁共振成像(MRI)参考标准,用于基于专家MRI读者对脊椎炎(SPA)分类的信心水平的阳性骶髂关节MRI寻找。方法采用四名读者(群组A和B)的四名读者评估了50岁及20岁常见的健康对照的2名连续患者的2次成立队(COHORTS A和B)中的SI关节躯干。根据临床检查和骨盆射线照相,患者分类为具有非显影轴向水疗中心(n = 51),强直性脊柱炎(n = 34)或非特异性背部疼痛(n = 72)。读者在0-10规模上表明他们对SPA分类的信心水平,其中0 =绝对不是SPA和10 =明确的水疗中心。 MRI参考标准被认为是大多数读者的共识,表明置信度得分为8-10;没有SPA需要所有读者指示非水疗中心(置位评分为0-4)。我们使用Kappa统计计算了基于MRI的临床分类与MRI的中间人可靠性和协议。我们估计了MRI病变的截止值,其特异性适用于水疗中心的特异性0.90。导致群组A和B,76.4%和71.6%的受试者分别达到MRI标准。 Intereader协议的Kappa值为群组A和0.80对于群组B的0.76,并且MRI为基础和临床评估为群组A和0.57的群组B.使用该MRI参考标准,影响受影响的SI关节的截止在两个群组中,在骨髓水肿(BME)中需要达到0.90的预定义特异性的象限是骨髓和1的侵蚀,并且BME和/或侵蚀性病变增加了敏感性而不降低特异性。结论该数据驱动的研究采用2次成立队列和比较临床和MRI的分类支持,包括包括侵蚀和BME的案例,以定义轴向水疗分类的正SI联合MRI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号