首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures, how to buttress? Reversed L posteromedial or the posterolateral approach: a comparative cadaveric study
【24h】

Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures, how to buttress? Reversed L posteromedial or the posterolateral approach: a comparative cadaveric study

机译:后侧胫骨平台骨折,如何支撑? 逆转L后散术或后侧方法:比较尸体研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction The selection of a surgical approach for buttressing posterolateral tibial plateau fractures is controversial. Objective This study compared the surgical exposure area between the reversed L posteromedial approach (R-PM) and the posterolateral (PL) approach using the lateral plateau width as a metric.Materials and methods Twenty lower extremities from fresh frozen cadavers were included. The R-PM approach was used first and the boundary of the posterior tibial cortex exposure was marked with metal pins. With the same specimens, the PL approach was then performed and the exposure area was marked. After removing all soft tissue, an imaginary line was drawn from the lateral plateau rim anterior to the fibular head (L) to the posteromedial ridge of the tibia (M). Additional metal pins were used to indicate bony reference landmarks at the joint line on the posterior tibial plateau, including the lateral tibial spine (S), the lateral boundary with the PM approach (LPM) and the lateral boundary with the PL approach (LPL). All distances were measured using S as the reference point.Results The average distance from S to L, referred to as the lateral plateau width (A), was 32.62 mm. The average distances from S to LPM (B) and from S to LPL measured as a percentage of A were 43.72 and 81.41%, respectively. The average R-PM approach blind distance from LPM to LPL (C) as a percentage of the lateral plateau width was 58.45%, while the distance LPL to L (D), which represents the invisible blind distance with both approaches, was 15.37% of that width. Conclusions The PL approach provides better access for buttressing the posterolateral tibial plateau fracture than the R-PM approach. With the R-PM approach, the blind area on the lateral plateau which can be accessed only by the PL approach starts approximately at 43.72% and ends at 81.41% of the lateral tibial plateau width. When a fracture is located in this zone, the posterolateral approach is recommended.
机译:简介选择抗障碍胫骨平台骨折的外科手术方法是有争议的。目的本研究将逆转L后辐射近似(R-PM)和后侧(PL)方法与横向平台宽度的外科曝光区域进行比较。包括来自新鲜冷冻尸体的20下肢的材料和方法。首先使用R-PM方法,并用金属销标记后胫骨皮质暴露的边界。用相同的样本,然后进行PL方法,并标记曝光区域。在去除所有软组织之后,从横向高原边缘向腓骨缘(L)到胫骨后脊(M)的假想线。额外的金属销用于表示胫骨后胫骨平台上的关节线的骨粘件,包括横向胫骨脊柱,横向边界与PM方法(LPM)和PL方法(LPL)的横向边界。使用S作为参考点测量所有距离。结果从S到L的平均距离,称为横向平台宽度(A),为32.62mm。从S至LPM(b)的平均距离和从s至lpl测量的百分比分别为43.72和81.41%。平均R-PM接近从LPM到LPL(C)的盲距为横向平台宽度的百分比为58.45%,而距离LPL至L(d),这代表了两种方法的不可见盲距,为15.37%这个宽度。结论PL方法提供了比R-PM方法更好地接近后侧胫骨平台骨折。利用R-PM方法,横向高原上仅通过PL方法可接近的盲区域大约在43.72%上开始,以横向胫骨平台宽度的81.41%。当骨折位于该区域时,建议使用后侧方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号