...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Number of examined lymph nodes and nodal status assessment in distal pancreatectomy for body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma
【24h】

Number of examined lymph nodes and nodal status assessment in distal pancreatectomy for body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma

机译:远端胰腺切除术中检查淋巴结和节点状况评估的数量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: First, to assess the impact of the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) on staging and survival after distal pancreatectomy (DP) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Second, to identify the minimum number of ELNs (MNELNs) ensuring an accurate detection of nodal involvement. Third, to reappraise the role of lymph node (LN) parameters, including N-status and lymph node ratio (LNR). Background: In contrast with pancreatoduodenectomy, information on LN staging and the MNELN required in DP is lacking. Methods: Patients undergoing DP for PDAC at 2 academic hospitals from 2000 through 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system was used. The MNELN was estimated using the binomial probability law. Survival analyses were performed separately for node-negative and node-positive patients using univariable and multivariable models. Results: The study population consisted of 240 patients. The median number of ELN was 21, significantly lower in node-negative patients as compared with node-positive patients (18.5 vs 24.0; P = 0.001). The proportion of node-positive patients increased with increasing numbers of ELNs, whereas LNR showed an inverse trend. The estimated MNELN was 20. The number of ELN (e or <20) was an independent prognostic factor only in node-negative patients [odds ratio (OR) 3.23 for ELN <20), suggesting a stage migration effect. In node-positive patients, N2-class, but not LNR, was a significant predictor of survival at multivariable analysis (OR 1.68). Conclusion: The number of ELN affects nodal staging in body/tail PDAC. At least 20 LNs are required for correct staging. N-status is superior to LNR in predicting survival of node-positive patients.
机译:目的:首先,评估检查的淋巴结数(elns)的影响对胰腺癌(Pdac)远端胰腺切除术(DP)后的分期和存活。其次,确定埃尔斯(MBLNS)的最小数量,确保准确地检测节点参与。第三,重新评估淋巴结(LN)参数的作用,包括n状态和淋巴结比(LNR)。背景:与胰蛋白酶切除术相比,缺乏关于LN分期的信息和DP所需的MBLN。方法:回顾性分析了2000年至2013年的2个学术医院接受了PDAC的DP患者。使用了美国癌症分期系统联合委员会第八版。使用二项式概率法估计MBLN。使用单变量和多变量型号分别进行存活分析,用于节点阴性和节点阳性患者。结果:研究人群由240名患者组成。与节点阳性患者相比,ELN的中值为21,节点阴性患者显着降低(18.5 vs 24.0; p = 0.001)。随着尤利人的增加,节点阳性患者的比例增加,而LNR呈现出反向趋势。估计的MLLN为20. ELN(E或<20)的数量仅为Node-Digal患者的独立预后因子[ELN <20的odds比率(或)3.23),表明阶段迁移效果。在节点阳性患者中,N2类但不是LNR,是多变量分析(或1.68)的重要预测因子。结论:ELN的数量影响身体/尾PDAC的节点分期。正确分期至少需要20个LNS。 N-STAME优于预测节点阳性患者的存活方面的LNR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号