...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Measurement in Education >Differential Item Functioning for Accommodated Students with Disabilities: Effect of Differences in Proficiency Distributions
【24h】

Differential Item Functioning for Accommodated Students with Disabilities: Effect of Differences in Proficiency Distributions

机译:适用于残疾学生的差分项目:熟练分配差异的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined the effect of similar vs. dissimilar proficiency distributions on uniform DIF detection on a statewide eighth grade mathematics assessment. Results from the similar- and dissimilar-ability reference groups with an SWD focal group were compared for four models: logistic regression, hierarchical generalized linear model (HGLM), the Wald-1 IRT-based test, and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. A DIF-free-then-DIF strategy was used. The rate of DIF detection was examined among all accommodated scores and common accommodation subcategories. No items were detected for DIF using the similar ability distribution reference group, regardless of method. With the dissimilar ability reference group, logistic regression and Mantel-Haenszel flagged 8-17%, and the Wald-1 and HGLM test flagged 23-38% of items for DIF. Forming focal groups by accommodation type did not alter the pattern of DIF detection. Creating a reference group to be similar in ability to the focal group may control the rate of erroneous DIF detection for SWD.
机译:该研究检测了相似与异种熟练程度分布对全州八年级数学评估的均匀差异分布的影响。将具有SWD焦点组的类似和异种能力参考组的结果进行了比较四个模型:Logistic回归,等级推广线性模型(HGLM),WALD-1基于IRT的测试和Mantel-Haenszel程序。使用了一种不同的DIF策略。在所有容纳的分数和共同的住宿亚类别中检查了DIF检测速率。无论方法如何,使用类似的能力分布参考组没有检测到不同的物品。通过不同的能力参考组,Logistic回归和Mantel-Haenszel标记为8-17%,沃尔德-1和Hglm测试标记为23-38%的DIF项目。通过容纳型形成焦距基团并未改变DIF检测的模式。创建参考组以相似的焦点组可以控制SWD的错误DIF检测速率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号