首页> 外文期刊>Applied Psychological Measurement >Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing
【24h】

Stratified Item Selection Methods in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing

机译:关于认知诊断计算机化自适应测试的分层项目选择方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT) aims to obtain more useful diagnostic information by taking advantages of computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) have been developed to classify examinees into the correct proficiency classes so as to get more efficient remediation, whereas CAT tailors optimal items to the examinee's mastery profile. The item selection method is the key factor of the CD-CAT procedure. In recent years, a large number of parametric/nonparametric item selection methods have been proposed. In this article, the authors proposed a series of stratified item selection methods in CD-CAT, which are combined with posterior-weighted Kullback-Leibler (PWKL), nonparametric item selection (NPS), and weighted nonparametric item selection (WNPS) methods, and named S-PWKL, S-NPS, and S-WNPS, respectively. Two different types of stratification indices were used: original versus novel. The performances of the proposed item selection methods were evaluated via simulation studies and compared with the PWKL, NPS, and WNPS methods without stratification. Manipulated conditions included calibration sample size, item quality, number of attributes, number of strata, and data generation models. Results indicated that the S-WNPS and S-NPS methods performed similarly, and both outperformed the S-PWKL method. And item selection methods with novel stratification indices performed slightly better than the ones with original stratification indices, and those without stratification performed the worst.
机译:认知诊断计算机化自适应测试(CD-CAT)旨在通过采取计算机化自适应测试(CAT)的优点来获得更有用的诊断信息。已经开发了认知诊断模型(CDMS)将考生分类为正确的熟练课程,以获得更有效的补救措施,而CAT裁定到考生的掌握性概况的最佳项目。项目选择方法是CD-CAT程序的关键因素。近年来,已经提出了大量的参数/非参数项目选择方法。在本文中,作者提出了一系列CD-CAT中的分层项目选择方法,其与后加权Kullback-Leibler(PWKL),非参数项目选择(NPS)以及加权非参数项目选择(WNPS)方法组合,并分别命名为S-PWKL,S-NP和S-WNPS。使用了两种不同类型的分层指数:原始与小说。通过模拟研究评估所提出的项目选择方法的性能,与PWK1,NPS和WNPS方法进行比较而没有分层。被操纵条件包括校准样本大小,项目质量,属性数,地层数量和数据生成模型。结果表明,S-WNP和S-NPS方法类似地进行,并且均优于S-PWKL方法。项目选择方法具有新颖的分层指数,比具有原始分层指数的略好表现稍微好,而没有分层的那些表现最差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号