首页> 外文OA文献 >New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing
【2h】

New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing

机译:认知诊断计算机自适应测试的新项目选择方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

© The Author(s) 2014.This article introduces two new item selection methods, the modified posterior-weighted Kullback–Leibler index (MPWKL) and the generalized deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate (G-DINA) model discrimination index (GDI), that can be used in cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing. The efficiency of the new methods is compared with the posterior-weighted Kullback–Leibler (PWKL) item selection index using a simulation study in the context of the G-DINA model. The impact of item quality, generating models, and test termination rules on attribute classification accuracy or test length is also investigated. The results of the study show that the MPWKL and GDI perform very similarly, and have higher correct attribute classification rates or shorter mean test lengths compared with the PWKL. In addition, the GDI has the shortest implementation time among the three indices. The proportion of item usage with respect to the required attributes across the different conditions is also tracked and discussed.
机译:©作者2014。这篇文章介绍了两个新的项目选择方法,改进的后加权kullback-leibler索引(MPWK1)和广义的确定性输入,嘈杂的“和”门(G-DINA)模型鉴别指数(GDI ),可用于认知诊断计算机化自适应测试。将新方法的效率与在G-DINA模型的上下文中使用仿真研究的后加权kullback-Leibler(PWKL)项目选择指数进行比较。还研究了项目质量,生成模型和测试终止规则对属性分类准确度或测试长度的影响。研究结果表明,与PWKL相比,MPWK1和GDI非常类似地执行,并且具有更高的正确属性分类速率或更短的均值测试长度。此外,GDI还具有三个索引中最短的实施时间。还跟踪并讨论了对不同条件上所需属性的项目使用的比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号