...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >Medical student and junior doctors' tolerance of ambiguity: development of a new scale
【24h】

Medical student and junior doctors' tolerance of ambiguity: development of a new scale

机译:医学学生和初级医生对歧义的容忍度:新规模的发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The practice of medicine involves inherent ambiguity, arising from limitations of knowledge, diagnostic problems, complexities of treatment and outcome and unpredictability of patient response. Research into doctors' tolerance of ambiguity is hampered by poor conceptual clarity and inadequate measurement scales. We aimed to create and pilot a measurement scale for tolerance of ambiguity in medical students and junior doctors that addresses the limitations of existing scales. After defining tolerance of ambiguity, scale items were generated by literature review and expert consultation. Feedback on the draft scale was sought and incorporated. 411 medical students and 75 foundation doctors in Exeter, UK were asked to complete the scale. Psychometric analysis enabled further scale refinement and comparison of scale scores across subgroups. The pilot study achieved a 64 % response rate. The final 29 item version of the Tolerance of Ambiguity in Medical Students and Doctors (TAMSAD) scale had good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.80). Tolerance of ambiguity was higher in foundation year 2 doctors than first, third and fourth year medical students (-5.23, P = 0.012; -5.98, P = 0.013; -4.62, P = 0.035, for each year group respectively). The TAMSAD scale offers a valid and reliable alternative to existing scales. Further work is required in different settings and in longitudinal studies but this study offers intriguing provisional insights.
机译:医学的做法涉及所固有的模糊性,从知识,诊断问题,治疗复杂性以及患者反应的不可预测性以及患者反应的局部局限性引起的。研究医生对歧义的容忍度受到不良概念清晰度和测量尺度不足的阻碍。我们旨在为医学生和初级医生的歧义进行耐受性,为解决现有尺度的局限性而制定和试验。在定义歧义的容忍之后,通过文献综述和专家咨询生成规模项目。寻求和纳入对草案草案的反馈。 411名医学院和75家基金会医生在英国被要求完成规模。心理测量分析使进一步的缩放细化和跨子组的比较分数比较。试点研究达到了64%的响应率。最终29个项目版本的医学生和医生(丹斯达)规模的含糊不大的容忍度具有良好的内部可靠性(Cronbach的Alpha 0.80)。基金会2名医生的含糊不高的含糊不大(-5.23,P = 0.012; -5.98,P = 0.013; -4.62,P = 0.035,分别为每年)。 Tamsad Scale提供了现有尺度的有效且可靠的替代品。在不同的环境和纵向研究中需要进一步的工作,但本研究提供了有趣的临时见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号