首页> 外文OA文献 >Medical student and junior doctors' tolerance of ambiguity: development of a new scale.
【2h】

Medical student and junior doctors' tolerance of ambiguity: development of a new scale.

机译:医学生和初级医生的歧义容忍度:新规模的发展。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The practice of medicine involves inherent ambiguity, arising from limitations of knowledge, diagnostic problems, complexities of treatment and outcome and unpredictability of patient response. Research into doctors' tolerance of ambiguity is hampered by poor conceptual clarity and inadequate measurement scales. We aimed to create and pilot a measurement scale for tolerance of ambiguity in medical students and junior doctors that addresses the limitations of existing scales. After defining tolerance of ambiguity, scale items were generated by literature review and expert consultation. Feedback on the draft scale was sought and incorporated. 411 medical students and 75 foundation doctors in Exeter, UK were asked to complete the scale. Psychometric analysis enabled further scale refinement and comparison of scale scores across subgroups. The pilot study achieved a 64% response rate. The final 29 item version of the Tolerance of Ambiguity in Medical Students and Doctors (TAMSAD) scale had good internal reliability (Cronbach's α 0.80). Tolerance of ambiguity was higher in foundation year 2 doctors than first, third and fourth year medical students (-5.23, P = 0.012; -5.98, P = 0.013; -4.62, P = 0.035, for each year group respectively). The TAMSAD scale offers a valid and reliable alternative to existing scales. Further work is required in different settings and in longitudinal studies but this study offers intriguing provisional insights.
机译:医学实践涉及内在的模棱两可,这是由于知识的局限性,诊断问题,治疗和结果的复杂性以及患者反应的不可预测性引起的。差的概念清晰度和不足的衡量标准阻碍了对医生对歧义的容忍度的研究。我们旨在创建并试行一种针对医学生和初级医生的歧义容忍度的测量量表,以解决现有量表的局限性。在定义歧义的容忍度之后,通过文献审查和专家咨询生成量表项目。征求并吸收了对比额表草案的反馈。要求英国埃克塞特的411名医学生和75名基础医生完成该量表。心理计量学分析可进一步扩展量表,并比较各个亚组的量表得分。初步研究获得了64%的回应率。医学生和医生的歧义容忍度(TAMSAD)量表的最后29个版本具有良好的内部可靠性(Cronbach'sα0.80)。基础二年级医生的歧义容忍度高于一年级,三年级和四年级的医学生(分别为-5.23,P = 0.012; -5.98,P = 0.013; -4.62,P = 0.035,分别为每年组)。 TAMSAD秤是现有秤的有效和可靠替代品。在不同的环境和纵向研究中还需要进一步的工作,但是这项研究提供了有趣的临时见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号