首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >Impact of funding allocation on physical therapist research productivity and DPT student graduates: an analysis using panel data
【24h】

Impact of funding allocation on physical therapist research productivity and DPT student graduates: an analysis using panel data

机译:资金分配对物理治疗师研究生产力和DPT学生毕业生的影响:使用面板数据分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Financial support for institutional research is relatively stagnant, and thus institutions are likely to seek tuition revenue to offset the costs of research and teaching. It is likely that this has led to increases in tuition driven activities, and thus has limited research activities of academic physical therapy (PT) programs in particular. However, the relationships between sources of program revenue, the number of graduates from PT programs, and the scholarly production of PT faculty have not been studied. The purpose of this paper is to study the effects of types of fundingincluding research grants and tuitionon the number of physical therapy graduates from each program and the research productivity of physical therapy faculty. Data from 2008 to 2016 were utilized to perform a fixed-effects panel analysis. Panel models created predictions for the number of graduates and the number of peer-reviewed publications for programs from grant funding, annual tuition, and number of funded faculty members. In any given program, a 1% increase in annual tuition is associated with 24% more graduates per year, but a single percentage point increase in the mix of NIH grant funding over other funding types is associated with 8% fewer graduates, all else equal. For every 1% increase in annual tuition, a program can expect to have 41% fewer publications per year. Those institutions with higher numbers of graduates tended to have higher numbers of publications. Higher annual program tuition appears to be associated with both higher numbers of physical therapy graduates and lower levels of publications. Different funding sources have variable effects on degree production and scholarly productivity. Data are self-reported by programs on the Annual Accreditation Report, and cause and effect cannot be established through observational design.
机译:对机构研究的财政支持相对缓解,因此机构可能寻求学费收入来抵消研究和教学的成本。这可能导致学费驱动活动增加,因此特别是学术物理治疗(PT)计划的研究活动有限。然而,计划收入来源与PT计划的毕业生数量与PT教师的学术生产之间的关系尚未研究。本文的目的是研究融资的研究赠款和薪酬的类型的影响来自每个方案的物理治疗毕业生的数量和物理治疗能力的研究生产力。从2008年到2016年的数据被利用来执行固定效果面板分析。面板模型创建了毕业生次数的预测以及来自赠款资金,年度学费和资助教职员人数的方案的同行评审出版物的数量。在任何特定的计划中,每年增加1%的学费增加与每年24%的毕业生有关,但NIH授予资金组合的单一百分点增加与其他融资类型有关,毕业生减少8%,其他所有奖金。每年增加每年增加一次,该计划每年可以预计每年有41%的出版物。这些具有较高毕业生的机构往往具有更高的出版物。较高的年度计划学费似乎与较高数量的物理治疗毕业生和较低的出版物相关联。不同的资金来源对学位生产和学术生产力有变量影响。数据由年度认证报告的计划自我报告,无法通过观察设计建立原因和效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号