首页> 外文期刊>Annals of nuclear medicine >Evaluation of bone metastatic burden by bone SPECT/CT in metastatic prostate cancer patients: defining threshold value for total bone uptake and assessment in radium-223 treated patients
【24h】

Evaluation of bone metastatic burden by bone SPECT/CT in metastatic prostate cancer patients: defining threshold value for total bone uptake and assessment in radium-223 treated patients

机译:转移前列腺癌患者骨质骨质/ CT的骨转移负荷评价:在镭底骨摄取阈值和镭into-223患者中的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objectives To establish a new three-dimensional quantitative evaluation method for bone metastasis, we applied bone single photon emission tomography with computed tomography (SPECT/CT). The total bone uptake (TBU), which measures active bone metastatic burden, was calculated as the sum of [mean uptake obtained as standardized uptake value (SUV) above a cut-off level]?×?(the volume of the lesion) in the trunk using bone SPECT/CT. We studied the threshold value and utility of TBU in prostate cancer patients treated with radium-223 (Ra-223) therapy. Methods To establish the threshold value of TBU, we compared bone metastatic and non-metastatic regions in 61 prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis and 69 without. Five fixed sites in each patient were selected as evaluation points and divided into bone metastatic and non-metastatic sites. Sensitivity and specificity analysis was applied to establish the threshold level. Using the obtained threshold value, we then calculated the TBU in nine prostate cancer patients who received Ra-223 therapy, and compared the results with the bone scan index (BSI) by BONENAVI ? and visual evaluation of bone scintigraphy. Results Uptake was significantly lower in non-metastatic sites in patients with bone metastasis than in patients without metastasis. Sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed SUV?=?7.0 as the threshold level. There was a discrepancy between TBU and BSI change in two of the nine patients, in whom TBU change correlated with visual judgement, but BSI change did not. In two patients, BSI was nearly 0 throughout the course, but the TBU was positive and changed, although the change was not large. These results suggest that TBU may be more accurate and sensitive than BSI for quantitative evaluation of active bone metastatic burden. Conclusion We established a threshold value (SUV?>?7.0) for three-dimensional TBU for evaluating active bone metastatic burden in prostate cancer patients using bone SPECT/CT. Despite the small number of patients, we expect the change in TBU could be more accurate and sensitive than the change in BSI among patients who received Ra-223.
机译:摘要目的,建立一种新的骨转移的三维定量评价方法,我们用计算机断层扫描(SPECT / CT)施加骨单光子发射断层扫描。衡量活性骨转移负荷的总骨摄取(TBU)是计算为[在截止水平上方的标准摄取值(SUV)获得的[平均摄取]的总和]?×?(病变的体积)使用骨骼SPECT / CT的行李箱。我们研究了镭癌患者TBU的阈值和效用,含镭-223(RA-223)治疗。制定TBU阈值的方法,我们比较了61例前列腺癌患者骨转移和69例中的骨转移和非转移区域。每个患者的五个固定位点被选为评价点,分为骨转移性和非转移性位点。应用灵敏度和特异性分析来建立阈值水平。使用获得的阈值,我们在九个前列腺癌患者中计算了TBU,接受了RA-223治疗,并将结果与​​Bonenavi用骨扫描指数(BSI)进行了比较?骨闪烁图的视觉评价。结果在骨转移患者的非转移位点上较低的结果显着低于没有转移的患者。敏感性和特异性分析显示SUV?=?7.0作为阈值水平。 TBU和BSI在九名患者中的两名患者中发生了差异,TBU变化与视觉判断相关,但BSI变化没有。在两个患者中,BSI在整个课程中几乎是0,但TBU是积极的,变化,但变化并不大。这些结果表明,对于有源骨转移负担的定量评估,TBU比BSI更准确和敏感。结论我们为三维TBU建立了一个阈值(SUV?> 7.0),用于使用骨质SPECT / CT评估前列腺癌患者的活性骨转移负荷。尽管较少的患者,我们预计TBU的变化可能比接受RA-223的患者的BSI变化更准确和敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号