Genotype–phenotype relationship and risk stratification in loss‐of‐function SCN 5A SCN SCN 5A mutation carriers

摘要

Introduction Loss‐of‐function (LoF) mutations in the SCN 5A gene cause multiple phenotypes including Brugada Syndrome (BrS) and a diffuse cardiac conduction defect. Markers of increased risk for sudden cardiac death ( SCD ) in LoF SCN 5A mutation carriers are ill defined. We hypothesized that late potentials and fragmented QRS would be more prevalent in SCN 5A mutation carriers compared to SCN 5A ‐negative BrS patients and evaluated risk markers for SCD in SCN 5A mutation carriers. Methods We included all SCN5A loss‐of‐function mutation carriers and SCN 5A ‐negative BrS patients from our center. A combined arrhythmic endpoint was defined as appropriate ICD shock or SCD . Results Late potentials were more prevalent in 79 SCN 5A mutation carriers compared to 39 SCN 5A ‐negative BrS patients (66% versus 44%, p? = ? .021), while there was no difference in the prevalence of fragmented QRS . PR interval prolongation was the only parameter that predicted the presence of a SCN 5A mutation in BrS ( OR 1.08; p? ? .001). Four SCN 5A mutation carriers, of whom three did not have a diagnostic type 1 ECG either spontaneously or after provocation with a sodium channel blocker, reached the combined arrhythmic endpoint during a follow‐up of 44?±?52?months resulting in an annual incidence rate of 1.37%. Conclusion LP were more frequently observed in SCN5A mutation carriers, while fQRS was not. In SCN5A mutation carriers, the annual incidence rate of SCD was non‐negligible, even in the absence of a spontaneous or induced type 1 ECG . Therefore, proper follow‐up of SCN 5A mutation carriers without Brugada syndrome phenotype is warranted.