首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Therapeutic doses of neostigmine, depolarising neuromuscular blockade and muscle weakness in awake volunteers: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomised volunteer study
【24h】

Therapeutic doses of neostigmine, depolarising neuromuscular blockade and muscle weakness in awake volunteers: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomised volunteer study

机译:Neostigmine的治疗剂量,清醒志愿者的神经肌肉阻滞和肌肉弱点:双盲,安慰剂控制,随机志愿者研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Neostigmine reverses non‐depolarising neuromuscular blockade, but may cause muscle weakness when administered after full recovery of neuromuscular function. We hypothesised that neostigmine in therapeutic doses impairs muscle strength and respiratory function in awake healthy volunteers. Twenty‐one volunteers were randomised to receive two doses of either intravenous (i.v.) neostigmine 2.5?mg with glycopyrrolate 450?μg (neostigmine group, n?=?14) or normal saline 0.9% (placebo group, n?=?7). The first dose was administered immediately after obtaining baseline measurements, and the second dose was administered 15?min later. All 14 volunteers in the neostigmine group received the first dose, mean ( SD ) 35 (5.8) μg.kg ?1 , but only nine of these volunteers agreed to receive the second dose, 34 (3.5) ?g.kg ‐1 . The primary outcome was hand grip strength. Secondary outcomes were train‐of‐four ratio, single twitch height, forced expiratory volume in 1?s, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1?s/forced vital capacity ratio, oxygen saturation, heart rate and mean arterial pressure. The first dose of intravenous neostigmine with glycopyrrolate resulted in reduced grip strength compared with placebo, ?20 (20) % vs. +4.3 (9.9) %, p?=?0.0016; depolarising neuromuscular blockade with decreased single twitch height, ?14 (11) % vs. ?3.8 (5.6) %, p?=?0.0077; a restrictive spirometry pattern with decreased predicted forced expiratory volume in 1?s, ?15 (12) % vs. ?0.47 (3.4) %, p?=?0.0011; and predicted forced vital capacity, ?20 (12) % vs. ?0.59 (3.2) %, p??0.0001 at 5?min after administration. The second dose of neostigmine with glycopyrrolate further decreased grip strength mean ( SD ) ?41 (23) % vs. +1.0 (15) %, p?=?0.0004; single twitch height ?25 (15) % vs. ?2.5 (6.6) %, p?=?0.0030; predicted forced expiratory volume in 1?s ?23 (24) % vs. ?0.7 (4.4) %, p?=?0.0063; and predicted forced vital capacity, ?27.1 (22.0) % vs. ?0.66 (3.9) %, p?=?0.0010. Train‐of‐four ratio remained unchanged (p?=?0.22). In healthy volunteers, therapeutic doses of neostigmine induced significant and dose‐dependent muscle weakness, demonstrated by a decrease in maximum voluntary hand grip strength and a restrictive spirometry pattern secondary to depolarising neuromuscular blockade.
机译:发明内容Neostigmine逆转非偏振的神经肌肉阻滞,但在全核功能恢复后施用时可能会导致肌肉弱点。我们假设治疗剂量中的新骨胺损害令人醒着的健康志愿者的肌肉力量和呼吸功能。随机将二十一名志愿者接受两剂静脉注射(IV)Neostigmine 2.5?Mg,含甘瓶450Ωμg(Neostigmine Group,N?= 14)或正常盐水0.9%(安慰剂组,N?=?7) 。在获得基线测量后立即施用第一剂量,并在后面施用第二剂量15≤min。所有14个志愿者在Neostigmine组中接受了第一剂,平均值(SD)35(5.8)μg.kg?1,但只有九个志愿者同意接受第二剂量,34(3.5)?G.Kg -1。主要结果是手柄强度。二次结果是训练四个比例,单抽搐高度,强制呼气量为1?S,强制急性容量,强制呼气量为1?S /强制致命能力比,氧饱和度,心率和平均动脉压。第一剂的静脉内新霉素与丙吡咯酸盐导致抓地强度降低,与安慰剂相比,α20(20)%vs. + 4.3(9.9)%,p?= 0.0016;单排抽头高度降低,α降低,α,14(11)%,Δ3.8(5.6)%,p?= 0.0077;限制性肺活量测定模式,降低预测的强制呼气量,1?15(12)%与β0.47(3.4)%,p?= 0.0011;并预测强制生命能力,α2(12)%与α0(3.2)%,p≤≤0.59(3.2)%,在给药后5≤0.0001。第二剂新剂量的甘丙烯酸甲酸盐进一步降低抓握强度平均值(SD)?41(23)%vs. + 1.0(15)%,P?= 0.0004;单个抽搐高度?25(15)%与α.2.5(6.6)%,p?= 0.0030;预测强制呼气量在1?s?23(24)%与α0.7(4.4)%,p?= 0.0063;并预测强制生命能力,α27.1(22.0)%与α0.66(32.0)%,p?= 0.0010。训练的四个比例保持不变(p?= 0.22)。在健康的志愿者中,Neostigmine的治疗剂量诱导显着和剂量依赖性肌肉弱点,通过最大的自愿手柄夹持强度和二次偏振神经肌肉阻滞的限制性肺活量测定图案来证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号