...
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia and intensive care >Retrospective frailty determination in critical illness from a review of the intensive care unit clinical record
【24h】

Retrospective frailty determination in critical illness from a review of the intensive care unit clinical record

机译:从重症监护单元临床记录审查中的批判性疾病中的回顾性脆弱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Frailty is one of the major challenges for intensive care, affecting one-third of intensive care unit patients and being associated with a range of poor health outcomes. Determination of frailty in critical illness using the Clinical Frailty Scale has recently been adopted by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, but it is not known whether this is able to be measured from the clinical record without interviewing patients or their relatives. The aims of this retrospective cohort study were to test whether a Clinical Frailty Scale score could be assigned in an intensive care unit population from the clinical record, and to assess the inter-rater reliability of frailty measured in this manner. A total of 144 patients were enrolled. Of these, 137 (95%) were able to have a Clinical Frailty Scale score assigned, and 22 (15%) were scored as frail (Clinical Frailty Scale >= 5). Cohen's kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability between assessors was 0.67, confirming substantial agreement. Consistent with other critically ill cohorts, frailty was associated on multivariate analysis with age, Charlson comorbidity score, dependence with activities of daily living, and limitation of medical treatment, indicating validity of this approach to frailty measurement. Our results imply that frailty measurement is possible and feasible from the intensive care unit clinical record, which is of importance as routine measurement and reporting of frailty in intensive care units in our region increases. Future work should seek to validate an assigned Clinical Frailty Scale score with that obtained directly from patients or their next of kin.
机译:脆弱是重症监护的主要挑战之一,影响三分之一的重症监护病房,与一系列差的健康结果相关。澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护社会最近采用了临床脆弱规模的临床疾病中脆弱患者的测定,但尚不清楚这是否能够在不面试患者或其亲属的情况下从临床记录中衡量。该回顾性队列队列研究的目的是测试临床脆性分数是否可以从临床记录中的重症监护单位人群中分配,并评估以这种方式测量的脆弱间可靠性。共有144名患者注册。其中,137(95%)能够进行分配的临床体积评分,并且22(15%)被缩小为脆弱(临床体积尺度> = 5)。科恩在评估员之间的帧间可靠性的κcha系数为0.67,确认了大量协议。与其他批评性群体一致,脆弱与年龄,查理合并症评分的多变量分析相关,依赖日常生活活动,以及医疗的限制,表明这种方法的有效性为脆弱的测量。我们的结果意味着,从重症监护室临床记录中可能和可行的额外测量,这是由于我们地区的重症监护单位的常规测量和脆弱报告的重要性。未来的工作应该寻求验证直接从患者或其近亲中获得的指定的临床脆弱比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号