首页> 外文期刊>Current Anthropology: A World Journal of the Sciences of Man >Torture without Torturers Violence and Racialization in Black Chicago
【24h】

Torture without Torturers Violence and Racialization in Black Chicago

机译:没有酷刑者的酷刑,黑芝加哥的暴力和种族化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

What happens when trauma becomes a political frame for recognizing anti-black racism and police violence? I grapple with this question by illustrating the ways that survivors of police torture must present themselves as a part of a disability category. More broadly, this article demonstrates that, as opposed to being a category of difference unto itself, the idea of police torture in Chicago has been transformed through legal precedent, activism, and the resulting legislation to emerge, as it has in its latest rendition, as a medical condition. I argue that the role of trauma in producing such categories of disability is not unidirectional. Since racialized debilitation always already informs societal institutions before any contemporary incidence of state violence occurs, these concessions reify a "racial caste system" by putting the onus on the traumatized to gain state recognition. If they do not, then they have no one to blame but themselves. In sum, I show that the problem with trauma as a legal category is that it justifies inequality for black victims of police violence because these concessions betray a tacit assumption that they are debilitated by virtue of their racialized status before they can gain relief through the law.
机译:当创伤成为认识到抗黑色种族主义和警察暴力的政治框架时会发生什么?我通过说明警察酷刑的幸存者必须将自己作为残疾类别的一部分呈现来努力解决这个问题。更广泛地,本文表明,与本身的差异相反,芝加哥警察酷刑的想法已通过法律先例,激进主义主义以及所产生的立法改变,因为它在其最新的再现,作为医疗条件。我认为创伤在生产这些类别的残疾方面的作用并不是单向的。由于种族化的衰弱始终已经向社会机构通知了国家暴力的任何当代发生率之前,这些让步通过将ONU投入到获得国家认可的创伤来重新改造“种族种姓制度”。如果他们没有,那么他们就没有人责怪但自己。总而言之,我认为创伤作为法律类别的问题是,警察暴力的黑人受害者的不平等是证明了,因为这些让步背叛了默许假设他们在他们通过法律获得救济之前被诽谤的假设。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号