首页> 外文期刊>AIDS care. >Designing a sexual network study of men who have sex with other men: exploring racial and ethnic preferences in study design and methods
【24h】

Designing a sexual network study of men who have sex with other men: exploring racial and ethnic preferences in study design and methods

机译:设计与其他人发生性关系的男性的性网络研究:在研究设计和方法中探索种族和种族偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Black and Latino gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) have higher rates of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) than their White counterparts. Differences in sexual networks have been hypothesized to play an important role in the observed racial/ethnic disparities in risk. However, concerns about the acceptability and feasibility of conducting sociocentric sexual network studies have left a dearth of data on the structure of sexual networks of MSM. If certain network research procedures are unacceptable among target populations, biases may be introduced. We conducted qualitative interviews and brief surveys with 30 self-identified Black (n = 12), Hispanic/Latino, (n = 9) and White (n = 9) sexually active MSM in the Greater Boston area to assess the acceptability and feasibility of potential procedures for a sociocentric sexual network study. We found that referring recent sexual partners as part of a sociocentric network study was generally acceptable, but racial/ethnic differences emerged regarding specific preferences for how to recruit sexual partners. While the majority of Black participants (7/12) explained that they would not want their name disclosed to sexual partners approached for study participation, most Latino participants (7/9) preferred having the opportunity to inform referrals themselves about the study prior to researchers contacting them, and White participants (8/9) favored having researchers disclose their names when recruiting referrals, emphasizing the importance of transparency. In order to reduce differential rates of research participation, increase scientific validity, and reduce risks of social harm, researchers studying sexual networks among MSM should be aware of these potential differences, engage communities in study design, and provide participants with a variety of options for recruiting their sexual partners.
机译:黑色和拉丁裔同性恋,双性恋和其他与男人发生性关系的男性(MSM)具有比白色同行更高的艾滋病毒和其他性传播感染(STIS)。性网络的差异已被假设在观察到的风险中的种族/民族差异中发挥着重要作用。然而,对进行社会学性网络研究的可接受性和可行性的担忧留下了关于MSM性网络结构的缺乏数据。如果目标人群之间的某些网络研究程序是不可接受的,则可以介绍偏差。我们在大波士顿地区进行了定性访谈和30个自我识别的黑(n = 12),西班牙/拉丁裔,(n = 9)和白色(n = 9)性活性MSM,以评估可接受性和可行性社会科学性网络研究的潜在程序。我们发现,作为社会经理网络研究的一部分,最近的性伴侣通常是可以接受的,但有关如何招募性伴侣的具体偏好出现了种族/民族差异。虽然大多数黑人参与者(7/12)解释说,他们不希望他们的名字透露在接近学习参与的性伴侣,大多数拉丁裔参与者(7/9)首选有机会在研究人员之前向自己提供信息联系他们,并在有研究人员招聘招聘时披露他们的名称,强调透明度的重要性。为了降低研究参与的差异率,提高科学的有效性,降低社会危害的风险,研究人物中的性网络的研究人员应该了解这些潜在的差异,从事研究设计中的社区,并为参与者提供各种选择招募他们的性伴侣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号