首页> 外文期刊>Clinical lung cancer >Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin as First-line Treatment of Nonsquamous Non–Small-cell Lung Cancer: A TRAIL Trial
【24h】

Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin as First-line Treatment of Nonsquamous Non–Small-cell Lung Cancer: A TRAIL Trial

机译:Docetaxel Plus顺铂的随机期III研究与Pemetrexed Plus顺铂作为Nonsquous非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗:追踪试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Micro-Abstract No prospective phase III trials have directly compared the efficacy of pemetrexed plus cisplatin (Pem-Cis) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (Doc-Cis) in nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. A total of 148 chemotherapy-naive patients lacking driver mutations were randomized to the Pem-Cis or Doc-Cis arm. The progression-free survival and response rate was similar between the 2 arms, although adverse events and more severe toxicities were observed more frequently in the Doc-Cis arm. Abstract Introduction To date, no prospective phase III trials have directly compared the efficacy of pemetrexed plus cisplatin (Pem-Cis) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (Doc-Cis) in patients with nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. Materials and Methods A total of 148 chemotherapy-naive patients lacking driver mutations were randomized into 21-day regimens of cisplatin 70 mg/m 2 with either docetaxel 60 mg/m 2 (n?= 71) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 (n?= 77) for?≤ 4 cycles. The primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of progression-free survival (PFS) for patients receiving the Doc-Cis regimen. The secondary endpoints were the response rates, overall survival, and toxicity profiles. Results Partial remission was observed in 24 (31.2%) and 24 (33.8%) patients in the Pem-Cis and Doc-Cis groups, respectively. The median PFS was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-5.0) in the Pem-Cis arm and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.1) in the Doc-Cis arm ( P .05). The median overall survival was longer in the Doc-Cis arm (13.3 months; 95% CI, 8.1-18.5) than in the Pem-Cis arm (11.7 months; 95% CI, 8.6-14.8; P .05). Between the 2 arms, no significant difference was found in the subsequent treatments after failure of first-line treatment. The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia was greater in the Doc-Cis arm than in the Pem-Cis arm. Conclusion In nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer patients lacking driver mutations, the PFS and response rates were similar between the 2 arms, and toxicity was tolerable, although adverse events and more severe toxicities were observed more frequently in the Doc-Cis arm.
机译:微自摘要没有前瞻性期III试验直接比较了Pemetrexed Plus顺铂(PEM-CIS)与多西紫杉醇加顺铂(Doc-CIS)在非小细胞肺癌中的疗效。共有148名缺乏驾驶员突变的化疗 - 天真患者随机分为PEM-CIS或DOC-CIS臂。两臂之间的无进展生存和反应率类似,尽管在DOC-CIS手臂中更频繁地观察到不良事件和更严重的毒性。摘要介绍迄今介绍,没有前瞻性第三阶段试验直接与Pemetrexed Plus顺铂(PEM-CIS)与Docetaxel Plus顺铂(Doc-CIS)的疗效进行了比较了非小型非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效。材料和方法共148名缺乏驾驶员突变的化疗 - 天真患者随机分为二氯丁70mg / m 2的21天方案,具有多元紫杉醇60mg / m 2(n = 71)或培养500mg / m 2( n?= 77)对于?≤4个循环。主要目的是评估接受DOC-CIS方案的患者的无进展生存(PFS)的不可取性。次要终点是响应率,总体存活和毒性谱。结果分别在PEM-CIS和DOC-CIS组中的24例(31.2%)和24名(33.8%)和24名(33.8%)患者中观察到部分缓解。 PEM-CIS ARM中的中位数PFS为4.7个月(95%置信区间[CI],4.4-5.0),4.4个月(95%CI,3.7-5.1)(P> .05) 。中位数生存在Doc-CIS ARM(13.3个月; 95%CI,8.1-18.5)中更长,而不是PEM-CIS ARM(11.7个月; 95%CI,8.6-14.8; P> 0.05)。在2臂之间,在初系治疗失败后随后的治疗中没有发现显着差异。在Doc-CIS臂中比PEM-CIS臂的3级或4个中性粒细胞率和发热中性粒细胞率高。结论在缺乏驾驶员突变的非小细胞肺癌患者中,PFS和反应率在2个臂之间相似,毒性是可忍受的,尽管在DOC-CIS ARM中更频繁地观察到不良事件和更严重的毒性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Clinical lung cancer》 |2017年第4期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Internal Medicine Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital;

    Department of Pathology Chonnam National University Medical School;

    Department of Internal Medicine Kosin University Gospel Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Dankook University Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Youngnam University Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Youngnam University Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Daegu Catholic University Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Wonkwang University Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Inha University Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Wonju Severance Christian Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Konkuk University Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Korea University Anam Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Pusan National University Hospital;

    Department of Internal Medicine Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

    Chemotherapy; Drug toxicity; East Asia; Progression-free survival; Treatment efficacy;

    机译:化疗;药物毒性;东亚;无进展生存;治疗疗效;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 00:41:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号