...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Nebivolol plus HCTZ and Irbesartan plus HCTZ in the Treatment of Isolated Systolic Hypertension in Elderly Patients: Results of the NEHIS Study
【24h】

Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Nebivolol plus HCTZ and Irbesartan plus HCTZ in the Treatment of Isolated Systolic Hypertension in Elderly Patients: Results of the NEHIS Study

机译:Nebivolol Plus HCTZ和Irbesartan Plus HCTZ在治疗老年患者孤立的收缩期高血压中的多中心随机双盲比较:尼希学习的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction The present study was aimed at comparing the antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability, and side effects profile of nebivolol/hydrochlorothiazide (NH) vs irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (IH) combination in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). Methods 124 ISH patients aged 69.1 ± 5.1 years (mean ± SD) were enrolled by 13 general practitioners in Netherlands and Belgium and randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either NH (5/12.5 mg day, n = 62) or IH (150/12.5 mg day, n = 62) for a 12-week period. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the comparison of the two combinations in terms of sitting office systolic blood pressure (BP) reduction after 12 weeks of treatment. In addition ambulatory BP, 24-h BP variability, tolerability, and safety profile were also investigated. Results 122 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. After 12 weeks of treatment the reduction of systolic BP with NH was significantly greater than IH (?25.8 ± 12 vs ?21.2 ± 14 mm Hg, P < 0.03). Diastolic BP reduction was significantly greater with NH after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment but similar at the end of the study (or after 12 weeks). In contrast, the magnitude of the 24-h, daytime, and nighttime systolic and diastolic BP reduction was almost similar in the two groups, while heart rate reduction induced by NH was significantly (P < 0.001) greater during the 24-h, daytime, and nighttime period than that induced by IH. NH caused a reduction in 24-h BP variability significantly greater than IH (standard deviation ?4.4 ± 2.7 vs ?2.2 ± 5.1 mm Hg, P < 0.02, variation coefficient ?2.0 ± 2.6 vs ?0.3 ± 3.4%, P < 0.01). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated. Conclusions These data provide evidence that NH reduces office BP more than IH but has similar effects on 24-h BP. NH reduces 24-h systolic and diastolic BP variability more than IH, suggesting a greater protective effect on a variable known to adversely affect prognosis. Trial Registration EU clinical Trials Register identifier, 2010-023104-28. Funding Menarini International Operations Luxembourg.
机译:引言本研究旨在比较尼比罗/氢氯噻嗪(NH)乙酰丙酮醛酰亚胺(NH)对老年患者的抗高血压疗效,耐受性和副作用概况(NH)的蛋白质含量的组合(IH)组合孤立的收缩期高血压(ISH)。方法69.1±5.1岁(平均±SD)的124例患者(平均±SD)被荷兰和比利时的13名普通从业者注册,并以双盲方式随机分机接受NH(5 / 12.5毫克,N = 62)或IH( 150 / 12.5 mg日,n = 62)为期12周。该研究的主要疗效终点是在治疗12周后,在坐在办公室收缩压(BP)减少的两种组合的比较。另外,还研究了外部动态BP,24-H BP可变性,耐受性和安全性。结果122名患者被纳入意向治疗分析。治疗12周后,用NH的收缩性BP的减少明显大于IH(?25.8±12 Vs?21.2±14 mm Hg,P <0.03)。在治疗4和8周后,NH舒张压BP减少明显大于,但在研究结束时(或12周后)。相反,在两组中,24-H,白天和夜间收缩期和夜间BP减少的幅度几乎相似,而NH诱导的心率降低在24-H时,NH诱导的(P <0.001)大和夜间期比IH引起的夜间期间。 NH导致24小时BP可变性的减少明显大于IH(标准差?4.4±2.7 Vs?2.2±5.1mm Hg,P <0.02,变化系数?2.0±2.6 Vs?0.3±3.4%,P <0.01) 。治疗方案都耐受良好。结论这些数据提供了证据表明,NH减少了Office BP超过IH,但对24-H BP具有类似的效果。 NH减少了24-H收缩性和舒张性BP变异性超过IH,表明对已知对预后的可变的可变的保护作用。试验登记欧盟临床试验寄存器标识符,2010-023104-28。资助Menarini国际运营卢森堡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号