...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in physiology education >A survey of student engagement with multiple resources in an undergraduate physiology course: retrieve or look it up
【24h】

A survey of student engagement with multiple resources in an undergraduate physiology course: retrieve or look it up

机译:对本科生理过程中多元资源的学生参与调查:检索或查找

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Retrieval practice, a deep-learning technique in which the learner attempts to recall a concept of interest from memory, has been shown to be more effective than surface-learning techniques. such as rereading a textbook. Accordingly, textbook publishers are developing supplemental resources that are purported to improve student learning outcomes by encouraging deep learning and critical thinking. The purpose of this study is to 1) survey students in a physiology course about their use of multiple course resources; and 2) assess the effect of self-reported engagement in course resources on learning outcomes, as assessed by comparing course grades. Students who had completed an undergraduate physiology course were sent an online survey about their course experience; two reminders were e-mailed. Students were asked to report their physiology course grade, satisfaction with how much they had learned. which resources they had used, and how they bad completed course assignments (critical thinking exercises and online quizzes), i.e., whether they had 1) looked up answers online. 2) looked up answers in the textbook, 3) tried to figure out the answers before using the textbook, or 4) only used their recall. Categories 1 and 2 were considered nonretrieval strategies. and categories 3 and 4 were considered retrieval strategies. There was no association with the type of resource students used and course grade or course satisfaction. Students who practiced retrieval strategies achieved significantly higher course grades than students who did not for both critical thinking exercises and online quizzes.
机译:检索实践,一种深度学习技术,其中学习者试图回想到感兴趣的感兴趣的概念,已经被证明比表面学习技术更有效。如重读教科书。因此,教科书发布者正在开发旨在通过鼓励深度学习和批判性思维来改善学生学习结果的补充资源。本研究的目的是1)调查学生在生理课程中有关他们对多课程资源的使用; 2)通过比较课程等级的评估,评估自我报告的参与在学习成果上的课程资源。完成本科生理课程的学生进行了关于他们课程经验的在线调查;两邮,两个提醒。学生被要求报告他们的生理课程成绩,满意于他们所学到的程度。他们使用过哪些资源以及它们如何完成课程任务(批判性思维练习和在线测验),即他们是否有1)在线查询答案。 2)在教科书中查找答案,3)尝试在使用教科书之前弄清楚答案,或者4)仅使用他们的召回。类别1和2被认为是非重症策略。和第3和第4类被认为是检索策略。没有与使用的资源类型和课程成绩或课程满意度相关联。练习检索策略的学生比没有针对批判性思维练习和在线测验的学生实现了更高的课程等级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号