首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Economics >Towards measuring political rents in agriculture: case studies of different agrarian structures in the EU
【24h】

Towards measuring political rents in agriculture: case studies of different agrarian structures in the EU

机译:衡量农业政治租金:欧盟不同农业结构的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It is generally believed that the subsidisation of agriculture serves as a payment of political rents to farmers. Here, we attempt to show that characterisation of the entire amount of subsidies as "political rent" is unjustified in the light of the definition of political rent as formulated in the rent-seeking theory. Political rents in agriculture diverge from the definition, since the resources devoted to rent-seeking partly serve to produce public goods - that part cannot be regarded as wastage. Furthermore, if market imperfections cause rents to be captured by other entities (the treadmill theory), then it is even more true that these benefits are not exclusive. However, it is hard to find any attempts to measure the value of political rents. Thus, a novel methodology is proposed for valuing these items, with the aim of calculating the "pure political rent", based on an input-output (I-O) Leontief approach adopting matrices for "representative farms" according to EUFADN typology and on a decomposition of the Hicks-Moorsteen TFP index for the period 2007-2012 for four countries: Slovakia, France, Austria and Poland.
机译:人们普遍认为,农业补贴是为农民支付的政治租金。在这里,我们试图表明,根据在寻求理论中制定的政治租金的定义,将整个补贴量的表征不合理。农业中的政治租金偏离定义,因为致力于租租的资源部分用于生产公共产品 - 这部分不能被视为浪费。此外,如果市场不完美导致其他实体捕获的租金(跑步机理论),那么这些益处不是排他性的更为真实。但是,很难找到衡量政治租金价值的尝试。因此,提出了一种新的方法来评估这些物品,目的是根据Eufadn类型和分解的输入输出(IO)Leontief方法计算“纯粹的政治租金”。 2007 - 2012年期间的HICKS-Moorsteen TFP指数:斯洛伐克,法国,奥地利和波兰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号