...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Economics >Towards measuring political rents in agriculture: case studies of different agrarian structures in the EU
【24h】

Towards measuring political rents in agriculture: case studies of different agrarian structures in the EU

机译:致力于衡量农业的政治租金:欧盟不同农业结构的案例研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is generally believed that the subsidisation of agriculture serves as a payment of political rents to farmers. Here, we attempt to show that characterisation of the entire amount of subsidies as “political rent” is unjustified in the light of the definition of political rent as formulated in the rent-seeking theory. Political rents in agriculture diverge from the definition, since the resources devoted to rent-seeking partly serve to produce public goods – that part cannot be regarded as wastage. Furthermore, if market imperfections cause rents to be captured by other entities (the treadmill theory), then it is even more true that these benefits are not exclusive. However, it is hard to find any attempts to measure the value of political rents. Thus, a novel methodology is proposed for valuing these items, with the aim of calculating the “pure political rent”, based on an input-output (I-O) Leontief approach adopting matrices for “representative farms” according to EUFADN typology and on a decomposition of the Hicks-Moorsteen TFP index for the period 2007–2012 for four countries: Slovakia, France, Austria and Poland.
机译:人们普遍认为,农业补贴是向农民支付的政治租金。在这里,我们试图表明,根据寻租理论中提出的政治租金的定义,将所有补贴金额都描述为“政治租金”是不合理的。农业中的政治租金与定义不同,因为专门用于寻租的资源部分用于生产公共物品–这部分不能被视为浪费。此外,如果市场不完善导致租金被其他实体所捕获(跑步机理论),那么这些收益并不是排他性的就更真实了。但是,很难找到任何衡量政治租金价值的尝试。因此,提出了一种新颖的方法来评估这些项目,目的是基于投入产出(IO)Leontief方法,根据EUFADN类型,对“代表农场”采用矩阵,并通过分解来计算“纯政治租金”。四个国家(斯洛伐克,法国,奥地利和波兰)的2007年至2012年Hicks-Moorsteen TFP指数的平均值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号