首页> 外文OA文献 >Political economy of agrarian politics in Kerala: A study of state intervention in agricultural commodity markets with particular reference to dairy markets.
【2h】

Political economy of agrarian politics in Kerala: A study of state intervention in agricultural commodity markets with particular reference to dairy markets.

机译:喀拉拉邦农业政治的政治经济学:一项关于国家干预农产品市场的研究,特别是关于乳制品市场的研究。

摘要

This thesis analyzes the nature of State intervention in agricultural commodity markets in the Indian province of Kerala in the period 1960-80. Attributing the lack of dynamism in the agrarian sector to market imperfections, the Government of Kerala has intervened both directly through departmentally run institutions and indirectly through public sector corporations. The failure of both these institutional devices encouraged the government to adopt marketing co-operatives as the preferred instruments of market intervention. Co-operatives with their decentralised, democratic structures are, in theory, capable of combining autonomous decision-making capacity with accountability to farmer members. The Government of Kerala believed that this institutional mechanism would aggregate the interests of peasants and thereby transform them into powerful market agents. We, however, argue that the nature of the interest group process, both within the organisation and in the larger polity, significantly, distorts policy outcomes. First, the nature of the intervention - the deployment of massive financial resources, the top-down approach with its commitment to the achievement of quantitative targets and the capital intensity of many of the projects-afford opportunities to powerful groups such as professional politicians and State bureaucrats to maximise their own interests. Second, groups within the organisation such as farmer-politicians with their proximity to decision-makers and trade unions with their links to political leaders are able to divert an increasing share of the organisation's resources to themselves. In the process, farmers, in whose name these policies are initiated, experience negative consequences. The above hypothesis is tested by analysing the implementation of Operation Flood-India's dairy development programme. Operation Flood (OF) was launched by the Government of India with the avowed aim of increasing farm incomes through an institutional framework( the Anand Pattern Co-operative of Gujarat) in which farmers would have control over their own resources. This research, however, finds that owing to interest group processes, the programme has produced sub-optimal results in Kerala. Producer prices have remained stagnant, while production costs have soared. Farmers have responded by restricting supplies, which has led to massive shortages in the market. Meanwhile the fiscal foundations of the organisations have been undermined, as powerful groups appropriated an increasing share of the organisations' resources. An intervention intended to optimise benefits for farmers, in fact, resulted in the dominant interest groups within the polity maximising their benefits.
机译:本文分析了印度在1960-80年间对喀拉拉邦农业商品市场进行干预的性质。由于农业部门缺乏活力是市场不完善的原因,喀拉拉邦政府直接通过部门运作的机构进行干预,并通过公共部门公司进行间接干预。这两种制度性手段的失败都鼓励政府采用营销合作社作为市场干预的首选手段。从理论上讲,合作社及其权力下放的民主结构能够将自主决策能力与对农民成员的责任相结合。喀拉拉邦政府认为,这种体制机制将凝聚农民的利益,从而将其转变为强大的市场代理人。但是,我们认为,利益集团流程的性质,无论在组织内部还是在更大范围内,都严重扭曲了政策结果。首先,干预的性质-部署大量财政资源,自上而下的方法及其对实现量化目标的承诺以及许多项目的资本密集度-为专业政治人物和国家等有实力的团体提供机会官僚们要最大化自己的利益。其次,组织中的团体,例如与决策者接近的农民政治家,以及与政治领袖有联系的工会,能够将组织资源中越来越多的份额转移给自己。在此过程中,以这些政策的名义发起的农民遭受了负面后果。通过分析“印度洪水行动”乳品开发计划的实施情况来检验上述假设。印度政府发起了“洪水行动”,其公开目标是通过一个体制框架(古吉拉特邦的阿南德模式合作社)来增加农民的收入,农民可以控制自己的资源。但是,这项研究发现,由于兴趣小组的参与,该计划在喀拉拉邦产生了次优的结果。生产者价格一直停滞不前,而生产成本却飙升。农民的反应是限制供应,这导致了市场的严重短缺。同时,由于强大的集团占用了越来越多的组织资源,这些组织的财务基础也遭到了破坏。实际上,旨在优化农民利益的一项干预措施导致了政体内的主导利益集团最大化了他们的利益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rajagopalan Velayudhan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1993
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号