首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development >POLITICAL RENTS OF EUROPEAN FARMERS IN?DIFFERENT AGRARIAN STRUCTURES OF THE UE: INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR SELECTED EU-27?COUNTRIES
【24h】

POLITICAL RENTS OF EUROPEAN FARMERS IN?DIFFERENT AGRARIAN STRUCTURES OF THE UE: INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR SELECTED EU-27?COUNTRIES

机译:UE不同农业结构下的欧洲农民政治租借:所选EU-27国家的投入产出分析

获取原文
           

摘要

It is generally believed that agricultural interventionism under the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy represents the payment of political rents to farmers. The authors attempt to show that the concept of political rent known as the rent-seeking theory is not valid for agricultural policy. It is not justified to identify the whole of the subsidies paid to agriculture in the EU as a “political rent”, since political rents cannot be taken to include payments for the supply of public goods or those transfers which compensate for market imperfections. A methodology is proposed for valuing these items, filling a gap existing in the literature on political economy. The authors perform comparative analyses with the aim of calculating the “pure political rent”, based on input-output matrices for representative farms according to the EUFADN typology and on a decomposition of the Hicks-Moorsteen TFP index for the period 2007–2012 and all EU-27 countries. The research hypothesis is proposed that the size of the subsidies retained in agriculture is a function of the political cycle, but also of market imperfections.
机译:人们普遍认为,根据欧盟共同农业政策制定的农业干预主义是向农民支付政治租金的手段。作者试图证明政治租金的概念,即寻租理论,不适用于农业政策。将欧盟支付给农业的全部补贴都称为“政治租金”是没有道理的,因为不能将政治租金包括在公共物品的支付或弥补市场缺陷的转移中。提出了一种评估这些项目的方法,以填补政治经济学文献中的空白。作者进行了比较分析,目的是根据代表农场的投入产出矩阵(根据EUFADN类型)以及2007-2012年的Hicks-Moorteen TFP指数的分解,计算出“纯政治租金”。欧盟27国。提出了研究假设,即农业中保留的补贴规模是政治周期的函数,也是市场不完善的函数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号