首页> 外文期刊>AEU: Archiv fur Elektronik und Ubertragungstechnik: Electronic and Communication >Comparative performance study of multiple-input bulk-driven and multiple-input bulk-driven quasi-floating-gate DDCCs
【24h】

Comparative performance study of multiple-input bulk-driven and multiple-input bulk-driven quasi-floating-gate DDCCs

机译:多输入批量驱动和多输入批量驱动的准浮动门DDCC的比较绩效研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This brief presents a comparative performance study of two recently presented techniques, the multiple-input bulk-driven (MI-BD) and the multiple-input bulk-driven quasi-floating-gate (MI-BD-QFG) MOS transistors (MOST). These techniques offer simplified CMOS structures of specific active elements and ensure near rail-to-rail operation capability under extremely low-voltage supply and reduced power consumption. However, to clarify the pros and cons of each technique, two Differential Difference Current Conveyors (DDCC) using MI-BD and MI-BD-QFG are compared. For the purpose of comparison, theoretical analysis such as small-signal model, open-loop gain, terminal resistances, gain bandwidth product, input referred thermal noise and maximum input range of the DDCCs are included. Furthermore, in order to provide a fair performance comparison both of the DDCCs is supplied with 0.4 V and consume same power 140 nW. The DDCCs were fabricated in a standard n-well 0.18 mu m CMOS process from TSMC and hence the results are confirmed theoretically and experimentally. (C) 2019 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:本简要介绍了两个最近呈现的技术的比较性能研究,多输入批量驱动(MI-BD)和多输入批量驱动的准浮栅(MI-BD-QFG)MOS晶体管(大多数) 。这些技术提供了特定有源元件的简化CMOS结构,并确保了极低低压供应下的轨道转向轨操作能力和降低的功耗。然而,为了阐明每种技术的优缺点,比较使用MI-BD和MI-BD-QFG的两个差分差分电流输送机(DDCC)。为了比较的目的,包括小信号模型,开环增益,端子电阻,增益带宽产品,输入参考热噪声以及DDCC的最大输入范围的理论分析。此外,为了提供公平的性能比较,DDCC两种DDCC都提供0.4 V并消耗相同的功率140 NW。从TSMC的标准N基质0.18μmCMOS过程中制造DDCC,因此理论上和实验确认结果。 (c)2019年Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号