首页> 外文期刊>Acta Neurochirurgica >The accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy (XT) vs computed tomography (CT) registration in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery
【24h】

The accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy (XT) vs computed tomography (CT) registration in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery

机译:3D荧光透视(XT)对计算机断层扫描(CT)的准确性在深脑刺激(DBS)手术中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Stereotactic registration is the most critical step ensuring accuracy in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. 3D fluoroscopy (XT) is emerging as an alternative to CT. XT has been shown to be safe and effective for intraoperative confirmation of lead position following implantation. However, there is a lack of studies evaluating the suitability of XT to be used for the more crucial step of registration and its capability of being merged to a preoperative MRI. This is the first study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and radiation exposure of XT- vs CT-based stereotactic registration and XT/MRI merging in deep brain stimulation. Methods Mean absolute differences and Euclidean distance between planned (adjusted for intraoperative testing) and actual lead trajectories were calculated for accuracy of implantation. The radiation dose from each scan was recorded as the dose length product (DLP). Efficiency was measured as the time between the patient entering the operating room and the initial skin incision. A one-way ANOVA compared these parameters between patients that had either CT- or XT-based registration. Results Forty-one patients underwent DBS surgery-25 in the CT group and 16 in the XT group. The mean absolute difference between CT and XT was not statistically significant in thex(p = 0.331),y(p = 0.951), orz(p = 0.807) directions. The Euclidean distance between patient groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.874). The average radiation exposure with XT (220.0 +/- 0.1 mGy*cm) was significantly lower than CT (1269.3 +/- 112.9 mGy*cm) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in registration time between CT (107.8 +/- 23.1 min) and XT (106.0 +/- 18.2 min) (p = 0.518). Conclusion XT-based frame registration was shown to result in similar implantation accuracy and significantly less radiation exposure compared with CT. Our results surprisingly showed no significant difference in registration time, but this may be due to a learning curve effect.
机译:背景技术立体定向注册是最关键的步骤,确保深脑刺激(DBS)手术中的准确性。 3D荧光透视(XT)作为CT的替代品。 XT已被证明是安全有效的植入后铅位置的术中确认。然而,缺乏研究评估XT的适用性用于更重要的登记步骤及其合并到术前MRI的能力。这是第一次研究XT-VS基于CT的立体定向注册和XT / MRI在深脑刺激中合并的准确性,效率和辐射暴露。方法计算计划(对术中检测的调整)和实际铅轨迹之间的绝对差异和欧几里德距离,以便植入的准确性。从每次扫描的辐射剂量被记录为剂量长度产品(DLP)。作为患者进入手术室和初始皮肤切口之间的时间测量效率。单向Anova比较了基于CT或XT的注册的患者之间的这些参数。结果40-一名患者在CT组中接受了DBS外科-25和XT组中的16例。 CT和XT之间的平均绝对差异在X(P = 0.331),Y(P = 0.951),ORZ(P = 0.807)方向上没有统计学意义。患者组之间的欧氏距离没有显着差异(p = 0.874)。 XT的平均辐射暴露(220.0 +/- 0.1 mgy * cm)显着低于CT(1269.3 +/- 112.9 mgy * cm)(P <0.001)。 CT(107.8 +/- 23.1分钟)和XT(106.0 +/- 18.2分钟)之间的注册时间没有显着差异(p = 0.518)。结论显示基于XT的框架注册,导致植入精度相似,与CT相比显着降低辐射曝光。我们的结果令人惊讶地显示出注册时间没有显着差异,但这可能是由于学习曲线效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号